Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

Upper-extremity Approach for Secondary Access in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: August 8, 2025
Candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: fitting the PARTNERS criteria
Michael J Babcock1, Steven Lavine, Joel A Strom
1Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida.
Insights
Identifying patients for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) is challenging. A minimum of 150-170 severe aortic stenosis (AS) patients are needed annually to support a TAVR program.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Heart Valve Disease
Background:
- Severe aortic stenosis (AS) prevalence is known, but identifying candidates for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) is less established.
- Understanding the TAVR candidate population is crucial for developing new TAVR programs.
- Professional societies suggest a minimum of 20-24 annual cases to sustain a TAVR program.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate the annual patient volume meeting PARTNER-B criteria for TAVR.
- To provide insights into the necessary patient volume for TAVR program sustainability.
Main Methods:
- Screened 21,652 patients from a single-center echocardiography registry over 3 years.
- Identified 833 patients with AS, stratified by severity.
- Assessed nonsurgical candidates against PARTNER-B exclusion criteria for TAVR eligibility.
Main Results:
- 133 patients (16%) had symptomatic AS; 50 (38%) were nonsurgical candidates.
- Nonsurgical candidates had significantly higher STS scores (11.1 ± 10.8 vs. 4.0 ± 3.3, P < 0.001).
- Only 18 patients (14%) met PARTNER-B criteria for TAVR, indicating a need for 150-170 symptomatic severe AS patients for 20-24 annual TAVR cases.
Conclusions:
- The prevalence of patients meeting PARTNER-B criteria for TAVR can be low in real-world practice.
- High-volume or regional referral centers may be necessary strategies for TAVR program implementation.
- Optimizing patient selection and referral pathways is essential for TAVR program success.
Objectives:
To determine an estimate patient volume with severe AS meeting PARTNER-B criteria, with the objective of providing insights into the annual volume needed to sustain a TAVR program.
Background:
While the prevalence of AS is well documented, potential TAVR candidates remains less established. A better understanding of this population is critical for the development of TAVR programs. Though no clear volume has been determined, societies suggest a minimum of 20-24 annual cases to establish a TAVR program.
Methods:
A total of 21,652 patients were screened from a single center echocardiography registry over a 3-year period. From them, 833 patients with AS were identified representing our study population. Severity was stratified by echocardiographic criteria. Those identified to have moderate-to-severe and severe AS were further investigated to determine clinical status and surgical candidacy. Nonsurgical candidates were cross referenced with the PARTNER-B exclusion criteria to determine eligibility for TAVR.
Results:
Symptomatic AS was present in 133 patients (16%). Fifty (38%) were considered nonsurgical candidates. Nonsurgical patients had higher STS score (11.1 ± 10.8 vs. 4.0 ± 3.3, P < 0.001). After applying PARTNERS-B exclusion criteria, only 18 patients (14%) were considered TAVR candidates. These findings indicate that to meet the recommended annual volume of 20-24 TAVR cases, a minimum of 150-170 symptomatic severe AS patients are required.
Conclusion:
In real world clinical practice, the prevalence of AS meeting PARTNERS-B criteria for TAVR can be low. These findings suggest that either high volume valvular centers or regional referral centers will need to be considered as part of the strategy to incorporate this new technology into clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
