Methenamine hippurate for preventing urinary tract infections
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

Transurethral Induction of Mouse Urinary Tract Infection
Published on: August 5, 2010
Bon San B Lee1, Tushar Bhuta, Judy M Simpson
1SpinalMedicine Department, Prince ofWalesHospital, Randwick, Australia. guslogie@gmail.com.
Background:
Methenamine salts are often used as an alternative to antibiotics for the prevention of urinary tract infection (UTI). This review was first published in Issue 1, 2002 and updated in Issue 4, 2007.
Objectives:
To assess the benefits and harms of methenamine hippurate in preventing UTI.
Search Methods:
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL in The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (from 1950), EMBASE (from 1980), reference lists of articles and abstracts from conference proceedings without language restriction. Manufacturers' of methenamine salts were contacted for unpublished studies and contact was made with known investigators.Date of last search: June 2012
Selection Criteria:
Randomised controlled trials (RCT) and quasi-RCTs of methenamine hippurate used for the prevention of UTIs in all population groups were eligible. A comparison with a control/no treatment group was a prerequisite for selection.
Data Collection And Analysis:
Two authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and the results expressed as risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI). An exploration of heterogeneity and a detailed description of results, grouped by population, was undertaken.
Main Results:
Thirteen studies (2032 participants) were included. Six studies (654 patients) reported symptomatic UTI and eight studies (796 patients) reported bacteriuria. Overall, study quality was mixed. The overall pooled estimates for the major outcome measures were not interpretable because of underlying heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses suggested that methenamine hippurate may have some benefit in patients without renal tract abnormalities (symptomatic UTI: RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.89; bacteriuria: RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.83), but not in patients with known renal tract abnormalities (symptomatic UTI: RR 1.54, 95% CI 0.38 to 6.20; bacteriuria: RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.54 to 3.07). For short-term treatment duration (1 week or less) there was a significant reduction in symptomatic UTI in those without renal tract abnormalities (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.38). The rate of adverse events was low.
Authors' Conclusions:
Methenamine hippurate may be effective for preventing UTI in patients without renal tract abnormalities, particularly when used for short-term prophylaxis. It does not appear to work in patients with neuropathic bladder or in patients who have renal tract abnormalities. The rate of adverse events was low, but poorly described.There is a need for further large well-conducted RCTs to clarify this question, particularly for longer term use for people without neuropathic bladder.
Insights
Methenamine hippurate may prevent urinary tract infections (UTIs) in individuals without kidney abnormalities, especially for short-term use. It appears ineffective for those with neuropathic bladder or kidney issues. Adverse events were infrequent but poorly documented.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Methenamine salts are utilized as an alternative to antibiotics for preventing urinary tract infections (UTIs).
- This systematic review was initially published in 2002 and updated in 2007.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of methenamine hippurate in preventing UTIs.
- To assess the benefits and harms associated with methenamine hippurate for UTI prophylaxis.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs assessing methenamine hippurate for UTI prevention.
- Searched multiple databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE) and contacted manufacturers for studies up to June 2012.
- Two independent reviewers assessed study quality and extracted data, using random-effects models for analysis.
Main Results:
- Included 13 studies with 2032 participants; study quality was mixed.
- Methenamine hippurate showed potential benefit in patients without renal abnormalities (symptomatic UTI: RR 0.24; bacteriuria: RR 0.56).
- No significant benefit was observed in patients with renal abnormalities (symptomatic UTI: RR 1.54; bacteriuria: RR 1.29). Short-term use (≤1 week) significantly reduced symptomatic UTIs in those without renal issues.
Conclusions:
- Methenamine hippurate may be effective for UTI prevention in patients without renal tract abnormalities, particularly for short-term prophylaxis.
- It appears ineffective in patients with neuropathic bladder or existing renal abnormalities.
- Further high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm efficacy, especially for long-term use in patients without neuropathic bladder. Adverse events were low but poorly described.
Related Concept Videos
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Urinary Tract Infection IV: Nursing Management
Urinary Tract Calculi III: Medical Management
Urinary Tract Calculi IV: Nutrition Therapy and Prevention
Urinary Tract Infection I: Introduction
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management

