Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Reports I: Hand-off Report01:25

Types of Reports I: Hand-off Report

A hand-off report, also known as a change-of-shift report, is a crucial nursing process that ensures the smooth transition of patient care responsibilities between nursing staff.
Following are the key components and categories of hand-off reports:
Purpose and Process:
SBAR I: Understanding the Concept01:29

SBAR I: Understanding the Concept

Effective communication among healthcare professionals during hand-off reporting is essential to delivering safe and continuous patient care. Common professional interactions include reports to healthcare team members, hand-off, and transfer reports. Nurses routinely report information to other healthcare team members and also urgently contact healthcare providers to report changes in patient status.
Standardized methods of communication have been developed to ensure that information is...
Nursing Implementation01:15

Nursing Implementation

Implementation is the execution of the nursing care plan developed during the planning phase.
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching II: Planning and Implementation01:24

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching II: Planning and Implementation

Planning for learning involves the development of a teaching plan. Teaching plans are similar to nursing care plans—both follow the steps of the nursing process. Planning in the teaching process involves setting goals and outcomes. Here, goals identify what a patient needs to achieve to understand a healthcare topic better, whereas the outcomes are the action to be performed by the patient to achieve the goal within a timeframe. For example, if the goal is to educate the patient about insulin...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis01:24

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis

The nursing process provides a clinical decision-making framework for patients and families to establish and implement a personalized care plan. Since part of the nurse's duties is to teach patients, the steps of the nursing process are the most effective way to approach instruction. The nursing process and the teaching-learning process are inextricably linked.
It is critical to determine the patient's learning needs during the assessment. Determination of learning needs compounds data from the...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

National Emergency Department Overcrowding Scale as a Predictor for Running an In-Situ Simulation.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Evaluating stroke recognition and prehospital quality metrics in emergency dispatch: a retrospective cohort study comparing mimics and confirmed strokes.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Identifying delays impacting maternal and perinatal deaths using a facility-based death audit review system integrated with community engagement: a mixed methods study.

Journal of global health·2026
Same author

A Scoping Review of the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Surgical Skills (OSATS).

Journal of surgical education·2026
Same author

Core Measure Set for Patient Safety in Perioperative Care: A Clinical Practice-Oriented Consensus Study.

International journal of public health·2026
Same author

The 0.00015 degree problem: learning from the environmental debates around desflurane.

Anaesthesia·2026
Same journal

Audit and feedback in primary care: if you build it, will they come? Understanding which clinicians engage with an audit and feedback intervention.

BMJ quality & safety·2026
Same journal

Brief mindfulness-based intervention to improve clinician mindful behaviours and well-being at two US hospitals: a randomised controlled, mixed methods trial.

BMJ quality & safety·2026
Same journal

Paradox of engagement: precautionary public health alerts and gender inequality in cancer diagnosis-a quasi-experimental study.

BMJ quality & safety·2026
Same journal

Priorities for improving paediatric diagnosis: findings from a modified Delphi study.

BMJ quality & safety·2026
Same journal

Development and pilot evaluation of the implementation of a whole-team training pack to improve the effectiveness, efficiency, safety and equity of remote general practice.

BMJ quality & safety·2026
Same journal

Mapping Theories, Models and Frameworks from implementation science for evaluating quality improvement initiatives: a scoping review.

BMJ quality & safety·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2026

Using Simulation Models to Train Clinicians in the Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound
05:04

Using Simulation Models to Train Clinicians in the Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound

Published on: August 9, 2024

Mapping and assessing clinical handover training interventions.

Slavi Stoyanov1, Henny Boshuizen, Oliver Groene

  • 1Centre for Learning Sciences and Technologies, Open University of the Netherlands, PO Box 2960, Heerlen 6401 AT, The Netherlands; slavi.stoyanov@ou.nl.

BMJ Quality & Safety
|October 19, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study developed a framework for effective patient handover training interventions by identifying key themes and prioritizing them for practical application. Healthcare institutions can use this to improve training and enhance patient care.

More Related Videos

Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise
05:25

Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise

Published on: March 29, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2026

Using Simulation Models to Train Clinicians in the Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound
05:04

Using Simulation Models to Train Clinicians in the Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound

Published on: August 9, 2024

Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise
05:25

Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise

Published on: March 29, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Education
  • Patient Safety
  • Organizational Learning

Background:

  • Existing knowledge on handover and transfer of care training interventions is fragmented.
  • There is a need to understand the impact of training on handover practices and patient outcomes.
  • This study aimed to identify and structure effective training interventions for healthcare handovers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and define the content of various handover training interventions.
  • To propose practical measures for enhancing the effectiveness of handover training.
  • To create a prioritized repository of approaches for improving handover practices.

Main Methods:

  • Group Concept Mapping approach utilized for expert consensus.
  • 105 statements from literature review and expert interviews were collected.
  • 21 specialists sorted statements by meaning and rated importance/feasibility.

Main Results:

  • Seven key clusters emerged: standardisation, communication, coordination, clinical microsystem care, transfer/impact, training methods, and workplace learning.
  • Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis informed the cluster identification.
  • Expert ratings provided prioritization based on importance and feasibility.

Conclusions:

  • A repository of prioritized handover training interventions can guide healthcare institutions.
  • Implementing these interventions can improve formal training, workplace learning, and social learning.
  • The goal is to enhance handover practices and positively impact patient outcomes by embedding training within the clinical microsystem.