Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Doubly robust estimators of causal exposure effects with missing data in the outcome, exposure or a confounder
E J Williamson1, A Forbes, R Wolfe
1Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia. ewi@unimelb.edu.au
Abstract:
We consider the estimation of the causal effect of a binary exposure on a continuous outcome. Confounding and missing data are both likely to occur in practice when observational data are used to estimate this causal effect. In dealing with each of these problems, model misspecification is likely to introduce bias. We present augmented inverse probability weighted (AIPW) estimators that account for both confounding and missing data, with the latter occurring in a single variable only. These estimators have an element of robustness to misspecification of the models used. Our estimators require two models to be specified to deal with confounding and two to deal with missing data. Only one of each of these models needs to be correctly specified. When either the outcome or the exposure of interest is missing, we derive explicit expressions for the AIPW estimator. When a confounder is missing, explicit derivation is complex, so we use a simple algorithm, which can be applied using standard statistical software, to obtain an approximation to the AIPW estimator.
Related Concept Videos
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Censoring Survival Data