Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

Developmental Toxicity Assay Based on Real-Time Monitoring of Fibroblast Growth Factor Signal Disruption in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Published on: October 10, 2025
Developmental toxicity prediction.
Raghuraman Venkatapathy1, Nina Ching Y Wang
1Pegasus Technical Services, Inc., Cincinnati, OH, USA. raghuraman.venkatapathy@ptsied.com
This chapter details software and methods for predicting developmental toxicity. It covers building structure-activity relationship (SAR) and quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models for chemical safety assessments.
Area of Science:
- Toxicology
- Computational Chemistry
- cheminformatics
Background:
- Developmental toxicity is a critical health endpoint requiring accurate assessment.
- Existing computational tools and methods can aid in predicting chemical developmental toxicity.
- Novel approaches are needed to enhance the reliability and scope of these predictions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe available software for predicting developmental toxicity.
- To present methodologies for developing qualitative (SAR) and quantitative (QSAR) models for developmental toxicity.
- To outline approaches for predicting physicochemical properties and validating predictive models.
Main Methods:
- Utilizing commercial and noncommercial software for toxicity prediction.
- Developing qualitative structure-activity relationship (SAR) models for yes/no predictions.
- Building quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models for quantitative toxicity estimates (e.g., LOAEL).
- Employing statistical methods for model building and validation.
- Predicting physicochemical properties as descriptor variables for QSAR models.
Main Results:
- A comprehensive overview of software for developmental toxicity prediction is provided.
- Methods for constructing both qualitative and quantitative structure-activity relationship models are detailed.
- Guidance on predicting chemical properties and validating predictive models is included.
Conclusions:
- Computational tools and SAR/QSAR modeling offer viable strategies for estimating developmental toxicity.
- The described methods are adaptable for assessing other health endpoints beyond developmental toxicity.
- This work provides a framework for enhancing chemical safety evaluations through predictive toxicology.
More Related Videos
17:28Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Based Developmental Toxicity Assays for Chemical Safety Screening and Systems Biology Data Generation
Published on: June 17, 2015
09:01A High-throughput Assay for the Prediction of Chemical Toxicity by Automated Phenotypic Profiling of Caenorhabditis elegans
Published on: March 14, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Toxicity Testing in Animals
Drug Toxicity: Dose-Dependent Reactions
Teratogenicity
Drug Toxicity: Risk factors
Toxicokinetics: Overview
Toxic Reactions: Overview
Toxicity falls into two primary categories: local and systemic.
Local toxicity appears at the exposure site, such as protein denaturation caused by caustic substances.
In contrast, systemic toxicity requires the toxic agent's absorption and distribution,...