Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Biological Effects of Radiation

Biological Effects of Radiation

All radioactive nuclides emit high-energy particles or electromagnetic waves. When this radiation encounters living cells, it can cause heating, break chemical bonds, or ionize molecules. The most serious biological damage results when these radioactive emissions fragment or ionize molecules. For example, α and β particles emitted from nuclear decay reactions possess much higher energies than ordinary chemical bond energies. When these particles strike and penetrate matter, they produce ions...

Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic

Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic

The correlation between a drug's dosage and its impact on a biological system is a cornerstone of pharmacology and toxicology. Conventional dose–response curves, which include graded and quantal relationships, are key to this understanding. Graded dose–response curves depict the spectrum of a biological reaction to different doses within an individual, indicating that as the drug dosage increases, so does the intensity of the response. On the other hand, quantal dose–response relationships...

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods

Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods

Determining the optimal dose size and dosing frequency in pharmacotherapy is crucial for achieving therapeutic effectiveness while minimizing adverse effects. This article explores the methodologies employed in determining these parameters, focusing on their significance and interplay to tailor dosing regimens.Dose Size: Dose size refers to the amount of a drug administered in a single dose. It is determined based on the drug's pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics properties and...

Toxicity Testing in Animals

Toxicity Testing in Animals

Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...

Relative Risk

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Traceable dosimetry for MeV ion beams.

Journal of instrumentation : an IOP and SISSA journal·2022

Same author

Proton Irradiation Platforms for Preclinical Studies of High-Dose-Rate (FLASH) Effects at RARAF.

Radiation research·2020

Same author

LET dependent response of GafChromic films investigated with MeV ion beams.

Physics in medicine and biology·2018

Same author

A Horizontal Multi-Purpose Microbeam System.

Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment·2018

Same author

Mathematical modelling of scanner-specific bowtie filters for Monte Carlo CT dosimetry.

Physics in medicine and biology·2017

Same author

THE DECADE OF THE RABiT (2005-15).

Radiation protection dosimetry·2016

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2026

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

We can do better than effective dose for estimating or comparing low-dose radiation risks.

¹Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA. djb3@columbia.edu

Annals of the ICRP

|October 24, 2012

Summary

The study proposes replacing the flawed

Area of Science:

Radiation dosimetry and risk assessment.
Medical physics and radiation protection.
Public health and environmental science.

Background:

The current effective dose concept, used for comparing radiation exposure risks, is based on flawed science.
Existing tissue weighting factors are subjective and do not account for age and gender dependencies in health detriments.
This leads to inaccurate estimations and comparisons of radiation-induced cancer risks.

Purpose of the Study:

To introduce a new radiation risk metric, 'effective risk', as a scientifically sound replacement for effective dose.
To address the limitations of effective dose by incorporating age- and gender-specific data.
To provide a more accurate and understandable measure of radiation-induced cancer risks.

Main Methods:

More Related Videos

An Automated Microscopic Scoring Method for the γ-H2AX Foci Assay in Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes

An Automated Microscopic Scoring Method for the γ-H2AX Foci Assay in Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes

Published on: December 25, 2021

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2026

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

An Automated Microscopic Scoring Method for the γ-H2AX Foci Assay in Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes

An Automated Microscopic Scoring Method for the γ-H2AX Foci Assay in Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes

Published on: December 25, 2021

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

Proposed 'effective risk' as a weighted sum of equivalent doses to different tissues.
Weighting factors for effective risk are derived from evaluated tissue-specific lifetime cancer risks per unit equivalent dose.
This contrasts with the subjective, committee-defined factors used in effective dose calculations.

Main Results:

Effective risk offers a scientifically robust alternative to effective dose for comparing radiation risks.
It allows for age and gender specificity, providing more personalized risk assessments.
The new metric is as easy to estimate as effective dose but is less prone to misuse and more understandable.

Conclusions:

Effective risk provides a more accurate and scientifically grounded method for assessing and comparing radiation-induced cancer risks.
Its potential for age and gender specificity enhances personalized risk management.
This approach offers greater clarity on the numerical values of radiation risks, aiding control efforts.