Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

X-ray Imaging01:24

X-ray Imaging

German physicist Wilhelm Röntgen (1845–1923) was experimenting with electrical current when he discovered that a mysterious and invisible "ray" would pass through his flesh but leave an outline of his bones on a screen coated with a metal compound. In 1895, Röntgen made the first durable record of the internal parts of a living human: an "X-ray" image (as it came to be called) of his wife’s hand. Scientists worldwide quickly began their own experiments with X-rays, and by 1900, X-ray was widely...
Biological Effects of Radiation02:59

Biological Effects of Radiation

All radioactive nuclides emit high-energy particles or electromagnetic waves. When this radiation encounters living cells, it can cause heating, break chemical bonds, or ionize molecules. The most serious biological damage results when these radioactive emissions fragment or ionize molecules. For example, α and β particles emitted from nuclear decay reactions possess much higher energies than ordinary chemical bond energies. When these particles strike and penetrate matter, they produce ions...
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT01:30

Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT

Radiological investigations, including X-rays and computed tomography (CT) scans, are critical for diagnosing and evaluating various medical conditions. These imaging techniques provide valuable insights into the body's internal structures, aiding in the detection of abnormalities, assessment of disease progression, and development of treatment strategies. This article delves into two primary radiological investigations, chest X-rays and CT scans, outlining their purpose, procedures, and the...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray01:20

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray

The most common cardiovascular diagnostic test is an X-ray. It produces images of the heart, blood vessels, and adjacent structures.
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI01:14

Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI

Introduction: MRI and CT scans are crucial advancements in medical imaging techniques, playing a vital role in diagnosing conditions related to the gastrointestinal (GI) system. Each scan serves distinct purposes, targets specific areas, and requires unique nursing duties.
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan01:13

Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan

Radiological investigations are paramount in the diagnosis and management of various pulmonary diseases. Two essential investigations are the Pulmonary Angiogram and the Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan.
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

PROPOSALS FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS FOR RADIOGRAPHY FOR ADULT PATIENTS BASED ON REGIONAL DOSE SURVEYS IN RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2016
Same author

Fourth review of the UK national patient dose database.

The British journal of radiology·2012
Same author

On protecting the inexperienced reader from Chernobyl myths.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2012
Same author

Contribution of internal exposures to the radiological consequences of the Chernobyl accident.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2007
Same author

The Chernobyl Forum: major findings and recommendations.

Journal of environmental radioactivity·2007
Same author

National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003.

The British journal of radiology·2007

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2026

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities
06:51

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities

Published on: February 20, 2021

Effective dose and risks from medical X-ray procedures.

M I Balonov1, P C Shrimpton

  • 1Institute of Radiation Hygiene, 8 Mira St, 197046 St. Petersburg, Russia. m.balonov@mail.ru

Annals of the ICRP
|October 24, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Medical X-ray radiation risks vary significantly by patient age and sex. Children face higher risks, while senior patients have lower risks compared to younger individuals. Effective dose calculations can underestimate or overestimate these risks.

More Related Videos

X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging
08:30

X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging

Published on: September 11, 2011

An Automated Microscopic Scoring Method for the γ-H2AX Foci Assay in Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes
08:23

An Automated Microscopic Scoring Method for the γ-H2AX Foci Assay in Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes

Published on: December 25, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2026

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities
06:51

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities

Published on: February 20, 2021

X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging
08:30

X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging

Published on: September 11, 2011

An Automated Microscopic Scoring Method for the γ-H2AX Foci Assay in Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes
08:23

An Automated Microscopic Scoring Method for the γ-H2AX Foci Assay in Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes

Published on: December 25, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiological Protection
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Medical X-ray examinations (radiography, fluoroscopy, CT) involve radiation exposure.
  • Assessing radiation risks is crucial for patient safety and effective dose management.
  • Previous risk models (ICRP Publication 103, UNSCEAR) provide frameworks for dose and risk estimation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess radiation risks from medical X-ray procedures based on patient age and sex.
  • To compare risk estimates derived from organ doses versus effective doses.
  • To evaluate the accuracy of effective dose in representing age- and sex-specific radiation risks.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized risk models from ICRP Publication 103 and UNSCEAR.
  • Calculated typical organ doses and effective doses for various X-ray examinations.
  • Performed independent dose and risk calculations at two institutions (Russia and UK).

Main Results:

  • Radiogenic risk of stochastic health effects varies significantly with patient age and sex.
  • Children's risks are estimated to be up to 4 times higher than adults'; senior patients' risks are lower by a factor of ≥ 10.
  • Effective dose underestimates risks in children (up to 4x) and overestimates risks in adults (up to 3x) and seniors (10x).

Conclusions:

  • Radiation risk from X-rays is highly dependent on patient age and sex, influencing cancer risk.
  • Effective dose alone is insufficient for accurate risk assessment across different age groups.
  • Adjustments to nominal risk per effective dose are needed to account for age and sex variations in radiological practice.