Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
Preserving integrity in the face of performance threat: self-affirmation enhances neurophysiological responsiveness
Lisa Legault1, Timour Al-Khindi, Michael Inzlicht
1Department of Psychology, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699, USA. llegault@clarkson.edu
Abstract:
Self-affirmation produces large effects: Even a simple reminder of one's core values reduces defensiveness against threatening information. But how, exactly, does self-affirmation work? We explored this question by examining the impact of self-affirmation on neurophysiological responses to threatening events. We hypothesized that because self-affirmation increases openness to threat and enhances approachability of unfavorable feedback, it should augment attention and emotional receptivity to performance errors. We further hypothesized that this augmentation could be assessed directly, at the level of the brain. We measured self-affirmed and nonaffirmed participants' electrophysiological responses to making errors on a task. As we anticipated, self-affirmation elicited greater error responsiveness than did nonaffirmation, as indexed by the error-related negativity, a neural signal of error monitoring. Self-affirmed participants also performed better on the task than did nonaffirmed participants. We offer novel brain evidence that self-affirmation increases openness to threat and discuss the role of error detection in the link between self-affirmation and performance.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Protecting Self-Esteem
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Self-Serving Bias
