Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Methods of Documentation V: CBE01:23

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions01:29

Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions

Creating and executing a nursing diagnosis helps nurses plan care and guide patient, family, and community interventions. They are developed based on a patient's physical evaluation and support measuring the outcomes. It is not recommended to select random interventions throughout the planning process. Instead, consider the following six essential factors when choosing interventions:
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Introduction to Epidemiology01:26

Introduction to Epidemiology

Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers01:13

Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers

In certain scenarios, in vitro dissolution tests can replace in vivo bioequivalence studies. This is particularly true when a drug product, though available in varying strengths, maintains proportional similarity in its active and inactive ingredients. In such cases, the need for in vivo bioequivalence studies for lower strength variants may be waived, provided dissolution tests and in vivo studies on the highest strength yield satisfactory results.Bioequivalence can be indicated through...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Design and methodology of a randomized clinical trial of prolonged daily antibiotic suppression with and without fulguration for uncomplicated recurrent urinary tract infections in women.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Quantitative Analysis of External Urethral Sphincter Stimulation Parameters for Modulating Urinary Output.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Strain level variation in <i>Proteus mirabilis</i> chondroitin sulfate degradation kinetics and regulation by urea.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Bladder wall-embedded bacteria associated with increased risk of recurrence after electrofulguration in women with antibiotic-recalcitrant urinary tract infection.

JU open plus·2026
Same author

Inter-observer and Intra-observer Reproducibility for the Determination of Female Urethral Narrowing on Voiding Cystourethrogram: A Retrospective Study.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Patterning Bacterial Cells on Quasi-Liquid Surfaces for Biofilm Morphological Control.

Advanced functional materials·2026
Same journal

<sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-617 in a Canadian universal healthcare system.

Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada·2026
Same journal

From one chapter to the next Reflections on the CUA presidency.

Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada·2026
Same journal

Notes on a crisis and professional life.

Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada·2026
Same journal

Advocating for policy that promotes and maintains urologists of all genders.

Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada·2026
Same journal

Randomized, multicenter trial of ureteral stent placement vs. stent omission after ureteroscopy for renal stones.

Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada·2026
Same journal

The five amigos: Training and practicing under the living titans of Queen's Urology.

Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

What is an evidence-based appropriate workup?

Philippe E Zimmern1

  • 1Professor of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Director of the Bladder and Incontinence Treatment Center, Dallas, TX.

Canadian Urological Association Journal = Journal De L'Association Des Urologues Du Canada
|October 25, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Currently, there is no evidence-based guidance for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) workup. Expert consensus suggests documenting SUI, assessing patient impact, and evaluating voiding function for standard cases.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery

Background:

  • There is a lack of evidence-based guidelines for the diagnostic workup of stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
  • Current practice relies on expert consensus in the absence of high-quality research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the current expert consensus on the workup for stress urinary incontinence.
  • To provide a framework for evaluating patients with SUI, considering variations in clinical presentation.

Main Methods:

  • Review of expert opinion and common clinical practices for SUI evaluation.
  • Identification of key components for a standard SUI workup.
  • Consideration of modifications for complex patient populations.

Main Results:

  • A typical SUI workup should include documentation of the condition, assessment of its impact on the patient's quality of life, and evaluation of voiding function.
  • Workup strategies may require adjustments for patients with mixed incontinence or those who have not responded to prior treatments.

Conclusions:

  • Expert consensus provides a foundational approach to SUI workup in the absence of definitive evidence.
  • Clinical judgment is essential to tailor the SUI evaluation to individual patient needs and complexities.