Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Complexity of images: experimental and computational estimates compared.

Valeriy Chikhman1, Valeriya Bondarko, Marina Danilova

  • 1Pavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, nab. Makarova 6, 199034 St Petersburg, Russia. niv@pavlov.infran.ru

Perception
|October 26, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Visual complexity can be estimated using different image parameters. For hieroglyphs, complexity correlates with spatial-frequency and image area, while object outlines depend on the number of turns.

Related Concept Videos

Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography01:27

Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography

DefinitionComputed Tomography (CT) of the genitourinary (GU) tract is a non-invasive imaging modality that utilizes X-rays and computer processing to generate detailed cross-sectional images of the urinary system, encompassing the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and adjacent structures such as the adrenal glands.PurposeCT scans of the GU tract serve several diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, including:Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Diseases: Detects kidney stones, tumors, cysts, and congenital...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Electrophysiological Response of the Non-Anesthetized Primate Brain to Minimally Invasive Local Infrared Neural Stimulation in Chronic Experiments.

Brain topography·2025
Same author

Contributed talks II: The caerulean line: Its relationship to the red-green category boundary of deuteranomalous observers.

Journal of vision·2025
Same author

Color Vision 2023: Introduction by the feature editors.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2023
Same author

Separation in the visual field has divergent effects on discriminating the speed and the direction of motion.

Current biology : CB·2020
Same author

Color Vision 2020: Introduction by the feature editors.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2020
Same author

Incomplete figure perception and invisible masking.

Perception·2007

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Computer Vision
  • Image Analysis

Background:

  • Understanding visual complexity is crucial for image processing and human perception.
  • Existing models often struggle to universally quantify visual complexity across diverse image types.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and model visual complexity using parameters related to visual processing mechanisms.
  • To determine if a single complexity measure can predict human perception for different image categories.

Main Methods:

  • Psychophysical experiments involving human observers ranking stimulus complexity.
  • Analysis of spatial characteristics, spatial-frequency content, and JPEG file size as complexity predictors.
  • Correlation analysis between predicted and perceived complexity for hieroglyphs and object outlines.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Main Results:

  • For Chinese hieroglyphs, complexity was best predicted by the product of squared spatial-frequency median and image area.
  • For outline objects, complexity was best predicted by the number of turns in the image.
  • Different predictive models were optimal for hieroglyphs and outline objects, though other measures showed significant correlations.

Conclusions:

  • Visual complexity can be modeled using quantifiable image parameters.
  • The optimal measures for estimating visual complexity differ across distinct image categories.
  • This suggests a need for category-specific approaches in visual complexity modeling.