Prospect theory does not describe the feedback-related negativity value function
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)
Published on: June 3, 2009
Thomas D Sambrook1, Matthew Roser, Jeremy Goslin
1Cognition Institute, School of Psychology, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK. tom.sambrook@plymouth.ac.uk
Abstract:
Humans handle uncertainty poorly. Prospect theory accounts for this with a value function in which possible losses are overweighted compared to possible gains, and the marginal utility of rewards decreases with size. fMRI studies have explored the neural basis of this value function. A separate body of research claims that prediction errors are calculated by midbrain dopamine neurons. We investigated whether the prospect theoretic effects shown in behavioral and fMRI studies were present in midbrain prediction error coding by using the feedback-related negativity, an ERP component believed to reflect midbrain prediction errors. Participants' stated satisfaction with outcomes followed prospect theory but their feedback-related negativity did not, instead showing no effect of marginal utility and greater sensitivity to potential gains than losses.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Effects of feedback
Feedback significantly modifies the gain of a control system. The gain of a system without feedback is altered by a factor of one plus GH, where G represents...
Negative and Positive Feedback
Feedback Inhibition
Root Loci for Positive-Feedback Systems
The construction rules for the root locus in positive feedback systems are similar to those in...
Positive and Negative Feedback Loops
Characteristics of OpAmp

