Translational spinal cord injury research: preclinical guidelines and challenges

Paul J Reier1, Michael A Lane, Edward D Hall

  • 1Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA. reier@mbi.ufl.edu

Insights

Rigorous preclinical studies are crucial for successful spinal cord injury (SCI) clinical translation. Ensuring therapeutic robustness and independent replication is vital to bridge the gap between animal research and human treatments.

Area of Science:

  • Neurobiology
  • Translational Medicine
  • Spinal Cord Injury Research

Background:

  • Advances in spinal cord injury (SCI) neurobiology highlight the need to translate experimental findings into clinical applications.
  • Preclinical studies are central to the translational process, but face challenges in optimizing progression and avoiding past clinical trial failures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and expand upon preclinical design strategies for SCI research.
  • To discuss preclinical considerations for cellular and pharmacological approaches in acute/subacute and chronic SCI.
  • To analyze current guidelines and their relation to past, present, and future clinical translations.

Main Methods:

  • Review of published opinion surveys on preclinical SCI research design.
  • Discussion of cellular and pharmacological strategies for SCI.
  • Retrospective and prospective analysis of clinical translation examples and guidelines.

Main Results:

  • Therapeutic robustness and independent replication of experimental findings are critical prerequisites for clinical translation in SCI.
  • These prerequisites have not been fully embraced in current preclinical research practices.

Conclusions:

  • The notion that 'everything works in animals and nothing in humans' for SCI is challenged by the lack of rigor in the bench-to-bedside process.
  • Increased rigor in preclinical SCI studies, involving academia, clinicians, and industry, is necessary for successful clinical translation.