Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Fixed Action Patterns

Fixed Action Patterns

A fixed action pattern (FAP) is a specific, hard-wired sequence of behaviors that occurs in response to an external stimulus, called a sign stimulus. The behavior is “fixed” because it is essentially unchangeable—proceeding similarly across individuals of a species every time it occurs.

Osmoregulation in Fishes

Osmoregulation in Fishes

When cells are placed in a hypotonic (low-salt) fluid, they can swell and burst. Meanwhile, cells in a hypertonic solution—with a higher salt concentration—can shrivel and die. How do fish cells avoid these gruesome fates in hypotonic freshwater or hypertonic seawater environments?

Mate Choice

Mate Choice

Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...

Competition

Competition

When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.

Types of Selection

Types of Selection

Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Editorial: Current state of fish behaviour & welfare research: Honoring Victoria Braithwaite.

Frontiers in veterinary science·2023

Same author

The Effect of Substrate on Water Quality in Ornamental Fish Tanks.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2022

Same author

Inter- and intra-individual variation in resting oxygen consumption in post-larvae of the giant freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii (De Man).

Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology·2002

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2026

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes

Published on: August 29, 2016

Why do some fish fight more than others?

Felicity Huntingford¹, Priyadarshini Tamilselvan, Hussein Jenjan

¹Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom. felicity.huntingford@glasgow.ac.uk

Physiological and Biochemical Zoology : PBZ

|October 27, 2012

Summary

Animal aggressiveness, a consistent trait, has fitness consequences influenced by environmental conditions. Aggressive and nonaggressive individuals coexist due to context-dependent benefits and costs of fighting.

More Related Videos

Basic Methods for the Study of Reproductive Ecology of Fish in Aquaria

Basic Methods for the Study of Reproductive Ecology of Fish in Aquaria

Published on: July 20, 2017

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare

Published on: February 22, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2026

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes

Published on: August 29, 2016

Basic Methods for the Study of Reproductive Ecology of Fish in Aquaria

Basic Methods for the Study of Reproductive Ecology of Fish in Aquaria

Published on: July 20, 2017

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare

Published on: February 22, 2020

Area of Science:

Behavioral Ecology
Evolutionary Biology
Animal Behavior

Background:

Individual differences in aggressiveness are observed in many animal species.
The consistency of aggressiveness as a trait and its link to risk-taking behavior raise evolutionary questions.
Understanding the coexistence of aggressive and nonaggressive phenotypes within populations is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

To explore the evolutionary frameworks explaining long-term differences in animal aggressiveness.
To investigate the direct and indirect fitness consequences of varying aggressiveness levels.
To elucidate the reasons behind the coexistence of aggressive and nonaggressive individuals in a population.

Main Methods:

The study reviews existing literature on animal behavior and evolutionary theory.
It analyzes the direct and indirect fitness consequences of aggressiveness in fish.
Context-dependent fitness outcomes are examined in relation to environmental predictability.

Main Results:

Aggressiveness has direct fitness benefits (e.g., resource monopolization) and indirect costs (e.g., increased predation, higher metabolic demands).
Fitness consequences of aggressiveness are context-dependent, favoring aggressive individuals in simple, predictable environments.
Aggressive and nonaggressive fish thrive in different conditions, explaining their coexistence.

Conclusions:

The context-dependent nature of fitness consequences for aggressiveness explains the coexistence of diverse behavioral phenotypes.
Evolutionary frameworks are proposed to explain the consistency of aggressiveness and its link to risk-taking.
Further research is needed to fully understand the evolutionary dynamics of aggressiveness.