Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2026

Biotribological Testing and Analysis of Articular Cartilage Sliding against Metal for Implants
09:08

Biotribological Testing and Analysis of Articular Cartilage Sliding against Metal for Implants

Published on: May 14, 2020

Synthetic meniscus replacement: a review.

Anne Christiane Theodora Vrancken1, Pieter Buma, Tony George van Tienen

  • 1Orthopaedic Research Lab, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Huispost 357, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. a.vrancken@orthop.umcn.nl

International Orthopaedics
|October 27, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Biocompatibility and degradation comparisons of four biodegradable copolymeric osteosynthesis systems used in maxillofacial surgery: A goat model with four years follow-up.

Bioactive materials·2022
Same author

Augmented cartilage regeneration by implantation of cellular versus acellular implants after bone marrow stimulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies.

PeerJ·2017
Same author

In Vivo Performance of a Novel, Anatomically Shaped, Total Meniscal Prosthesis Made of Polycarbonate Urethane: A 12-Month Evaluation in Goats.

The American journal of sports medicine·2017
Same author

In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization of Biodegradable Reactive Isocyanate-Terminated Three-Armed- and Hyperbranched Block Copolymeric Tissue Adhesives.

Macromolecular bioscience·2017
Same author

Meniscus surgery is still widely performed in the treatment of degenerative meniscus tears in The Netherlands.

Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA·2017
Same author

The effect of tissue surface modification with collagenase and addition of TGF-β3 on the healing potential of meniscal tears repaired with tissue glues in vitro.

Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine·2016

Meniscus surgery is increasing. Synthetic meniscus implants offer an alternative to partial meniscectomy, but their superiority requires further proof through rigorous clinical trials.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Regenerative Medicine

Background:

  • Rising incidence of meniscus surgeries due to aging and active populations.
  • Partial meniscectomy is common for irreparable meniscal lesions, but some patients remain symptomatic.
  • Meniscal allografts are limited to severely damaged menisci, creating a need for alternatives.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the current landscape of synthetic meniscal substitutes.
  • To highlight the need for comprehensive preclinical evaluation of new meniscal implants.
  • To emphasize the necessity of randomized controlled trials for clinical validation.

Main Methods:

  • Review of currently available and developing synthetic meniscal implants.
  • Discussion of two main types: porous, resorbable, and solid, non-resorbable implants.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2026

Biotribological Testing and Analysis of Articular Cartilage Sliding against Metal for Implants
09:08

Biotribological Testing and Analysis of Articular Cartilage Sliding against Metal for Implants

Published on: May 14, 2020

  • Emphasis on the need for combined in vitro biomechanical and in vivo biological testing for preclinical evaluation.
  • Main Results:

    • Three synthetic meniscal implants (two partial, one total) are currently available.
    • Porous implants show promise but require further evidence of superiority over partial meniscectomy.
    • Current preclinical evaluations often lack sufficient biomechanical testing.

    Conclusions:

    • Synthetic meniscal substitutes are a viable option for many patients, but clinical superiority over existing treatments needs robust demonstration.
    • Future development and evaluation should integrate comprehensive biomechanical and biological testing.
    • Well-designed randomized controlled trials are essential to confirm the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of new meniscal replacement therapies.