Related Experiment Videos
Postoperative distal adding-on and related factors in Lenke type 1A curve
Morio Matsumoto1, Kota Watanabe, Naobumi Hosogane
1*Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan †Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Meijo Hospital, Nagoya Japan ‡Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Kobe Medical Center, Hyogo, Japan §Department of Advanced Medicine for Spine and Spinal Cord Disorders, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan ¶Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fukuoka Children's Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan; and ‖Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seirei Sakura Citizen Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Insights
Postoperative adding-on in Lenke type 1A curves is associated with residual main thoracic curve apical translation and the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) position. Surgeons should aim for maximal apical translation reduction and place the LIV at or below the last touching vertebra (LTV) to prevent this complication.
Area of Science:
- Spine surgery
- Orthopedic surgery
- Scoliosis correction
Background:
- Lenke type 1A scoliosis presents unique challenges in surgical correction.
- Factors influencing postoperative adding-on in this curve type require further elucidation in large cohorts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the incidence and contributing factors of postoperative adding-on in Lenke type 1A curves.
- To identify surgical parameters that can mitigate this complication.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective multicenter study of 112 patients with Lenke type 1A curves undergoing selective posterior thoracic fusion.
- Analysis of radiographic parameters including apical translation, curve correction, and vertebral levels (LIV, LTV) pre- and post-operatively.
- Logistic regression to identify factors associated with distal adding-on.
Main Results:
- Distal adding-on occurred in 18.8% of patients.
- Significant factors associated with adding-on included postoperative apical translation of the main thoracic curve and the difference between the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) and the last touching vertebra (LTV).
- Specifically, apical translation >25 mm (OR 10.7) and LIV-LTV <0 (OR 6.7) were strongly predictive of adding-on.
Conclusions:
- Residual apical translation of the main thoracic curve and a cranial placement of the LIV relative to the LTV are significant predictors of postoperative adding-on.
- Optimizing surgical technique to maximize apical translation correction and ensure adequate distal fusion to the LTV is crucial for preventing adding-on.
Study Design:
A retrospective, multicenter study.
Objective:
To investigate the occurrence of and factors related to postoperative adding-on in Lenke type 1A curve.
Summary Of Background Data:
Although several studies have investigated factors associated with adding-on in Lenke type 1A curve, these factors have not been elucidated in a large study population.
Methods:
This study included 112 patients who were followed more than 2 years after undergoing selective posterior thoracic fusion surgery for Lenke Type 1A curve (8 males, 104 females; mean age at surgery, 16.1 yr; mean follow-up, 3.6 yr). The lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) was T12 in 22 patients, L1 in 55, L2 in 32, and L3 in 3. Distal to the main thoracic curve, the end vertebra, neutral vertebra, stable vertebra (SV), and the last vertebra touching the central sacral vertical line (last touching vertebra, LTV) were determined. The occurrence and factors associated with distal adding-on were investigated.
Results:
The mean Cobb angle and apical translation of the main thoracic curve were 54.6° ± 9.6° and 53.1 ± 20.4 mm before surgery, and 14.2 ± 7.4 and 16.2 ± 12.7 at follow-up, respectively. Distal adding-on was observed in 21 patients (18.8%) at follow-up. Univariate analyses identified several factors significantly associated with adding-on, including the preoperative proximal thoracic curve, the apical translation of the main thoracic curve, Miyanji's subclassification, the postsurgical proximal and main thoracic curves, the postsurgical apical translation of the main thoracic curve, the correction rate of the main thoracic curve and the clavicle angle immediately after surgery and at follow-up, and the difference in levels between the LIV and the end vertebra, neutral vertebra, LTV, and stable vertebra. Logistic regression analysis showed that the apical translation of the main thoracic curve immediately after surgery (apical translation >25 mm, odds ratio: 10.7, 95% confidence interval: 3.1-37.0, P = 0.001) and the difference in levels between LIV and LTV (LIV-LTV) (LIV-LTV <0, odds ratio: 6.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.9-23.9, P = 0.003) were significantly associated with adding-on.
Conclusion:
Since the residual apical translation of the main thoracic curve and the lowest instrumented vertebra more cranial to the last touching vertebra were significantly associated with adding-on, surgeons may need to obtain the maximum reduction of the apical translation of the main thoracic curve and to extend the LIV at least to the LTV to avoid postoperative adding-on.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Residual Stresses in Bending