Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

Screening of Axonal Degeneration in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Using Ultrasonography and Nerve Conduction Studies
Published on: January 11, 2019
Factors influencing the diagnostic process of carpal tunnel syndrome
Mauro Mondelli1, Stefania Rossi, Michele Ballerini
1EMG Service, Local Health Unit 7, Siena, Italy. m.mondelli@usl7.toscana.it
Insights
Patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) should seek medical attention sooner. Factors like age, not the initial doctor, predict CTS severity, highlighting the need for public health service improvements.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Public Health
- Healthcare Management
Background:
- Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) diagnosis pathways and influencing factors are understudied.
- Understanding the diagnostic journey is crucial for timely intervention and management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the diagnostic pathway for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).
- To assess if physician type (GP vs. specialist) impacts diagnosis manner and timing.
- To identify predictors of CTS severity at diagnosis, including patient and public health factors.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study involving 375 patients with idiopathic CTS undergoing electromyography (EMG).
- Data collected via medical history forms, self-administered questionnaires (symptom severity), and neurophysiologist assessments (clinical and electrophysiological severity).
- Multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify predictors of CTS severity.
Main Results:
- Patients initially seeing general practitioners (GPs) were older, had lower education, more manual occupations, longer symptom duration, and greater clinical/electrophysiological severity.
- However, multivariate analysis revealed patient age and specific healthcare/patient factors, not the referring doctor's type, predicted CTS severity.
- The initial physician's type did not influence the diagnostic pathway.
Conclusions:
- Patients are advised to seek medical consultation earlier upon symptom onset for timely carpal tunnel syndrome treatment.
- Public health services can improve the diagnostic pathway by reducing waiting times for electrodiagnostic tests and enhancing patient information.
- Optimizing the CTS diagnostic process requires addressing patient-related factors and healthcare system efficiencies, rather than solely focusing on the referring physician.
Abstract:
There are no studies regarding the course leading to carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) diagnosis and factors influencing the diagnostic process. The study aim is to analyse CTS diagnostic path assessing whether the type of physician (general practitioners or specialist) may influence the manner and timing of diagnosis, and whether CTS severity at diagnosis may be predicted by factors related to Public Health Service and/or to patient. A medical history form was filled in by 375 consecutive patients with idiopathic CTS enrolled at an electromyography service. The patient answered a self-administered questionnaire on symptom severity and the neurophysiologist quantified clinical and electrophysiological CTS severity. The patients going directly to general practitioner were older and more blue collars, had minor education level, more symptom duration, more clinical and electrophysiological severity, more medical examination numbers, more time elapsing between first visit to a doctor and referral for EMG than those going to a specialist. But all variables are interrelated and when multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed, only patient age and some other few independent variables related to patient or health care but not to referring doctor could predict CTS severity at the diagnosis. Typology of the first doctor did not influence diagnostic path. The patients should reduce the time elapsing between CTS symptom onset and consulting doctor thus, permitting early treatments. Some corrective actions on diagnostic path may concern the public health service by reducing waiting lists to perform electrodiagnostic testing and giving greater information to population at risk.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
