Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pediatric rotavirus vaccination in British Columbia: a model-based evaluation

David N Fisman1, Christina H Chan, Elizabeth Lowcock

  • 1Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. david.fisman@utoronto.ca

Vaccine
|October 31, 2012
PubMed

Insights

Childhood rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) vaccination in Canada is highly cost-effective, preventing infections and hospitalizations. While increasing healthcare costs slightly, RVGE vaccines offer significant public health benefits.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Health Economics
  • Vaccinology

Background:

  • Rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) causes significant childhood illness and healthcare use globally.
  • Canada has approved two live rotavirus vaccines, RotaTeq and Rotarix, but their economic value is unevaluated.
  • Understanding the cost-effectiveness of RVGE vaccination is crucial for Canadian healthcare policy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the economic attractiveness of rotavirus vaccines in the Canadian context.
  • To model the impact of RVGE vaccination on disease burden and healthcare utilization in British Columbia children.

Main Methods:

  • A Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation model was used for economic analysis.
  • Models were parameterized with data on RVGE natural history, epidemiology, vaccine effectiveness, and costs.
  • Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of projections.

Main Results:

  • Childhood immunization is projected to prevent 63-81 RVGE infections per 100 children.
  • Vaccination is expected to prevent 1-2 hospitalizations per 100 children immunized.
  • Rotarix demonstrated higher cost-effectiveness ($2400 per QALY gained) compared to RotaTeq.

Conclusions:

  • RVGE vaccination in British Columbia children significantly reduces disease burden and healthcare utilization.
  • Vaccination is projected to result in a modest increase in healthcare costs.
  • Rotavirus vaccination is considered highly cost-effective compared to other health interventions.
Abstract