Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Physiological Models01:15

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Physiological Models

Physiological models in pharmacokinetics are instrumental in understanding the distribution and elimination of drugs within the body. These models describe the drug concentration within target organs, influenced by factors such as drug uptake, tissue volume, and blood flow. Drug uptake is governed by the partition coefficient, which signifies the drug concentration ratio in tissue to that in the blood. The blood flow rate to a specific tissue is expressed as Qt, and the rate of change in tissue...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview01:27

Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview

Pharmacodynamic (PD) responses describe the interaction between a drug and its biological target, culminating in a physiological effect. These responses can be classified into different types: continuous variables, such as blood glucose levels; categorical outcomes, like survival rates; and time-to-event metrics, such as disease progression. Understanding and modeling PD responses are critical for optimizing drug efficacy and safety.PD models describe the relationship between drug concentration...
Modeling with Differential Equations01:25

Modeling with Differential Equations

Population dynamics can be described mathematically by considering the population size P(t) as a function of time. The rate of change of the population is then represented by the derivative of P(t). A simple assumption is that the rate of growth is proportional to the size of the population itself. This leads to an exponential growth model, where the population increases rapidly without bound. While this is a useful first approximation, it does not reflect realistic long-term...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Link Model and Systems Pharmacodynamic Model01:14

Pharmacodynamic Models: Link Model and Systems Pharmacodynamic Model

The link model is a fundamental pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) approach to account for delayed drug responses when the observed effect does not immediately correlate with the drug's plasma concentration peak. This delay is mathematically addressed by introducing an effect compartment concentration, Ce, which is kinetically linked to the plasma concentration, Cp, via a first-order rate constant, ke0. The linkage allows for a more accurate prediction of drug effects over time. A higher...
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Blood Flow-Limited Versus Diffusion-Limited Models00:57

Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Blood Flow-Limited Versus Diffusion-Limited Models

Physiological pharmacokinetic models, often called flow-limited or perfusion models, typically assume a swift drug distribution between tissue and venous blood, creating a rapid drug equilibrium. This premise is based on the idea that drug diffusion is extremely fast, and the cell membrane presents no barrier to drug permeation. In this scenario, where no drug binding occurs, the drug concentration in the tissue equals that of the venous blood leaving the tissue. This greatly simplifies the...
Physiological Control of Respiration01:23

Physiological Control of Respiration

Introduction
Breathing, a seemingly passive process, is regulated by the respiratory center in the brainstem. This center coordinates the involuntary control of respirations, which means it occurs without conscious effort, ensuring a smooth and uninterrupted pattern.
Regulation of Ventilation
The body maintains ventilation by monitoring levels of carbon dioxide (CO2), oxygen (O2), and hydrogen ion concentration (pH) in the arterial blood. Among these factors, the level of CO2 plays a crucial...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Brain kappa opioid receptor availability across stress and social buffering conditions: A positron emission tomography study in coppery titi monkeys.

Neuroscience·2026
Same author

Estimating multivariate longitudinal trajectories using mixed-effects models with crossed random effects.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

A Non-Parametric Approach to Modeling Accelerated Longitudinal Designs.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same author

How to Use Residual Dynamic Structural Equation Modeling to Study Individual Differences and Intraindividual Variability in Experimental Factorial Designs: A Tutorial.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same author

Early Identification of Children at Risk for Long-Term Difficulties with Mathematics Learning and Innumeracy in Adolescence.

Journal of pediatric neuropsychology·2026
Same author

A State Space Model of Daily Dynamics with Moderation Effects from Qualitative Text Data.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2026

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

Dynamical systems modeling of physiological coregulation in dyadic interactions.

Emilio Ferrer1, Jonathan L Helm

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, CA 95616–8686, USA. eferrer@ucdavis.edu

International Journal of Psychophysiology : Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology
|October 31, 2012
PubMed
Summary

This study used dynamical systems to analyze physiological signals in couples, revealing how self-regulation and coregulation influence relationship dynamics and emotional well-being.

More Related Videos

Transforming Static Barrier Tissue Models into Dynamic Microphysiological Systems
06:20

Transforming Static Barrier Tissue Models into Dynamic Microphysiological Systems

Published on: February 16, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2026

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

Transforming Static Barrier Tissue Models into Dynamic Microphysiological Systems
06:20

Transforming Static Barrier Tissue Models into Dynamic Microphysiological Systems

Published on: February 16, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Dynamical Systems Theory
  • Interpersonal Psychology
  • Physiological Psychology

Background:

  • Understanding the interplay of physiological signals in dyadic interactions is crucial for comprehending relationship dynamics.
  • Previous models have explored dyadic interactions, but integrating physiological data with self-report measures offers deeper insights.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the interrelations of physiological signals (heart rate, respiration) within couples using a dynamical systems approach.
  • To investigate the roles of self-regulation and coregulation in dyadic interactions.
  • To explore the association between physiological parameters and self-reported affect.

Main Methods:

  • Applied a system of differential equations, adapted for dyadic research, to time series data of heart rate and respiration from 32 couples.
  • The model incorporated parameters for individual self-regulation and coregulation within the dyad.
  • Compared model parameters across three laboratory tasks and examined associations with parameters from a similar model fitted to daily affect self-reports.

Main Results:

  • The dynamical systems model successfully captured interrelations in physiological signals during dyadic interactions.
  • Identified distinct patterns of self-regulation and coregulation parameters across different laboratory tasks.
  • Found significant associations between physiological parameter estimates and self-reported affect parameters.

Conclusions:

  • Dynamical systems modeling provides a robust framework for analyzing physiological synchrony and regulatory processes in couples.
  • Physiological self-regulation and coregulation are key components of dyadic interaction dynamics.
  • Integrating physiological and self-report data enhances our understanding of emotional experiences and relationship functioning.