Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

07:36
An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Rule-breaking in an anonymous situation: when people decide to deviate from existing rules
Tatsuya Nogami1, Fujio Yoshida
1a Graduate School of Human Comprehensive Sciences, University of Tsukuba , Ibaraki , Japan.
Summary
People are hesitant to break rules for personal gain, even when anonymous. Rule-breaking for rewards, if it occurs, tends to happen only at the very last opportunity.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Behavioral Economics
Background:
- Understanding the psychological factors influencing rule-breaking behavior is crucial.
- Anonymity's impact on ethical decision-making remains a key research area.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the timing and conditions under which individuals violate rules for material gain.
- To assess the influence of anonymity levels on the propensity to break rules.
Main Methods:
- 100 participants were randomly assigned to self-reward or other-reward conditions.
- Participants engaged in coin-flip trials, with rule-breaking assessed based on assigned rewards.
- The degree of anonymity was a key variable manipulated in the experimental design.
Main Results:
- Rule-breaking for rewards was observed exclusively in the self-reward condition.
- Violations of assignment rules occurred only during the final coin-flip trial.
- No rule-breaking was observed in the other-reward condition.
Conclusions:
- Individuals are unlikely to immediately break rules for personal gain, even with anonymity.
- The decision to break rules for material benefit may be delayed until the final opportunity.
- Anonymity alone does not guarantee immediate rule-breaking behavior for self-benefit.
Related Concept Videos
Deindividuation
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
Obedience
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation, obedience...
Ethics in Research
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Deviation from Ideal Behaviour
Real gases do not perfectly obey the ideal gas laws, especially at high pressures and low temperatures or when they are about to condense to a liquid. These deviations occur due to intermolecular forces between gas molecules. Repulsive forces aid expansion and are significant when molecules are very close together, typically at high pressure. Attractive forces assist compression and have a longer range, being effective over several molecular diameters. They become significant when molecules are...
Groupthink
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
Naturalistic Observations
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
