Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

General Characteristics of Pipe Flow II01:24

General Characteristics of Pipe Flow II

When fluid enters a pipe, it first passes through the entrance region, where the velocity profile adjusts due to viscous effects. In this region, a boundary layer forms along the pipe walls and grows until it fully occupies the pipe's cross-section. Once the boundary layer merges, the flow becomes fully developed, with a steady velocity profile that remains consistent along the pipe's length.
The distance to reach a fully developed flow is called the entrance length and depends on the flow...
Design Example: Designing a Residential Plumbing System01:25

Design Example: Designing a Residential Plumbing System

The design of residential plumbing systems requires carefully evaluating water demand, flow rates, and pressure dynamics to ensure both efficiency and reliability. The nature of water flow within pipes is defined by its Reynolds number, which classifies flow as either laminar (smooth) or turbulent.
Laminar Flow01:27

Laminar Flow

Laminar flow represents a smooth, orderly fluid motion where particles move along parallel paths, resulting in minimal mixing between layers. Streamlined particle paths characterize this flow regime and occur under conditions where viscous forces dominate over inertial forces. The distinction between laminar, transitional, and turbulent flow is primarily determined by the Reynolds number, a dimensionless quantity calculated as:
Single Pipe Systems01:24

Single Pipe Systems

In pipe flow analysis, problems are typically categorized into three types — Type I, Type II, and Type III — based on the known parameters and the desired outcome. Each type of problem addresses specific engineering requirements using fluid properties, pipe characteristics, and operational conditions.
In a Type I problem, fluid properties (density and viscosity), pipe characteristics (including diameter, length, and surface roughness), and the flow rate or average velocity are known. The...
Laminar Flow: Problem Solving01:24

Laminar Flow: Problem Solving

Laminar flow occurs when a fluid moves smoothly in parallel layers with minimal mixing and turbulence. In fluid mechanics, ensuring laminar flow within a pipe is essential for precise control of flow characteristics, especially in engineering applications. The key factor in determining whether flow remains laminar is the Reynolds number, a dimensionless quantity that depends on the fluid's velocity, density, viscosity, and the pipe's diameter. A Reynolds number of 2100 or lower indicates...
General External Flow Characteristics01:26

General External Flow Characteristics

The study of external flow is essential for creating structures and objects that interact efficiently and safely with moving fluids, such as air or water. When a body is immersed in a flowing fluid, it experiences two primary forces: drag, which opposes motion along the flow direction, and lift, which acts perpendicular to the flow. The shape, size, and orientation of the object influence these forces.Streamlined and Blunt Bodies in External FlowObjects in fluid flow are classified as...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Structural Polymorphs of Self-Assembled Brome Mosaic Virus Capsid Protein.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2026
Same author

The role of apoptotic genetic polymorphisms in prostate cancer susceptibility in a North West Spain population.

Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG·2026
Same author

Air quality in a bus depot and a way of improving it: effect of using air purifiers.

Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)·2025
Same author

Computational modeling of the effect of five mutations on the structure of the ACE2 receptor and their correlation with infectivity and virulence of some emerged variants of SARS-CoV-2 suggests mechanisms of binding affinity dysregulation.

Chemico-biological interactions·2022
Same author

Use of three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics model for a new configuration of circular primary settling tank.

Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research·2021
Same author

Monopolar and dipolar relaxation in spin ice Ho<sub>2</sub>Ti<sub>2</sub>O<sub>7</sub>.

Science advances·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2026

Measuring Spray Droplet Size from Agricultural Nozzles Using Laser Diffraction
08:14

Measuring Spray Droplet Size from Agricultural Nozzles Using Laser Diffraction

Published on: September 16, 2016

Large diameter heads: is bigger always better?

J A Rodriguez1, P A Rathod

  • 1Center For joint Preservation & Reconstruction, North Shore LIJ/Lenox Hill Hospital, 130 E 77th street, 11th floor, New York, NY-10075, USA. josermd@aol.com

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume
|November 3, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Large femoral heads improve hip implant stability and reduce dislocation rates. However, diameters exceeding 38 mm may increase the risk of groin pain and psoas impingement without clear clinical benefits.

More Related Videos

Scaling of Engineered Vascular Grafts Using 3D Printed Guides and the Ring Stacking Method
09:38

Scaling of Engineered Vascular Grafts Using 3D Printed Guides and the Ring Stacking Method

Published on: March 27, 2017

A Cost-effective and Reliable Method to Predict Mechanical Stress in Single-use and Standard Pumps
07:34

A Cost-effective and Reliable Method to Predict Mechanical Stress in Single-use and Standard Pumps

Published on: August 5, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2026

Measuring Spray Droplet Size from Agricultural Nozzles Using Laser Diffraction
08:14

Measuring Spray Droplet Size from Agricultural Nozzles Using Laser Diffraction

Published on: September 16, 2016

Scaling of Engineered Vascular Grafts Using 3D Printed Guides and the Ring Stacking Method
09:38

Scaling of Engineered Vascular Grafts Using 3D Printed Guides and the Ring Stacking Method

Published on: March 27, 2017

A Cost-effective and Reliable Method to Predict Mechanical Stress in Single-use and Standard Pumps
07:34

A Cost-effective and Reliable Method to Predict Mechanical Stress in Single-use and Standard Pumps

Published on: August 5, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Biomedical engineering
  • Total hip arthroplasty

Background:

  • Increasing use of large femoral heads in hip arthroplasty over the last decade.
  • Primary driver for large heads is enhanced joint stability and reduced dislocation rates.
  • Larger head-neck ratio and increased jump distance contribute to improved impingement-free motion and dislocation resistance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the clinical efficacy and potential drawbacks of large femoral head diameters in total hip arthroplasty.
  • To determine if increasing femoral head diameter beyond 38 mm offers demonstrable clinical advantages.
  • To investigate the association between large femoral heads and adverse outcomes like groin pain and psoas impingement.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature and clinical data on femoral head sizes in hip arthroplasty.
  • Analysis of studies comparing dislocation rates, wear, and patient-reported outcomes with varying head diameters.
  • Examination of recent data linking large femoral heads to specific complications.

Main Results:

  • Multiple studies confirm reduced dislocation rates with larger femoral heads.
  • Crosslinked polyethylene demonstrates equivalent wear rates for both larger and smaller heads.
  • Clinical advantages of femoral head diameters exceeding 38 mm remain unproven.
  • Emerging data suggests a correlation between large heads and increased incidence of groin pain and psoas impingement.

Conclusions:

  • While large femoral heads offer stability benefits, diameters beyond 38 mm lack clear clinical advantages.
  • The potential for increased groin pain and psoas impingement necessitates careful consideration of head size.
  • Further clinical investigation is required to fully understand the long-term implications of using very large femoral heads.