Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
What are Populations and Communities?00:30

What are Populations and Communities?

Overview
Nonconscious Mimicry01:13

Nonconscious Mimicry

Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD01:21

Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD

A complete procedure of testing a hypothesis about a population mean when the population standard deviation is unknown is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used; instead...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Predictable and Divergent Change in the Multivariate <b>P</b> Matrix during Parallel Adaptation.

The American naturalist·2024
Same author

Inferring the evolution of reproductive isolation in a lineage of fossil threespine stickleback, <i>Gasterosteus doryssus</i>.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2024
Same author

Recording animal-view videos of the natural world using a novel camera system and software package.

PLoS biology·2024
Same author

Miocene phytolith and diatom dataset from 10.3Myo diatomite formation, Fernley, Nevada, USA.

Data in brief·2023
Same author

Convergence or redundancy: alternative views about the evolutionary genomics of character displacement.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2023
Same author

Repeated genetic divergence plays a minor role in repeated phenotypic divergence of lake-stream stickleback.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2026

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents
06:25

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents

Published on: May 16, 2025

Inferring predator behavior from attack rates on prey-replicas that differ in conspicuousness.

Yoel E Stuart1, Nathan Dappen, Neil Losin

  • 1Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America. yestuart@oeb.harvard.edu

Plos One
|November 3, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Predators

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral ecology
  • Evolutionary biology
  • Predator-prey dynamics

Background:

  • Predator responses to novel prey are influenced by detection and post-detection behaviors.
  • Conspicuousness of prey can confound studies on predator preferences.
  • Few studies account for prey conspicuousness in predator behavior research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate predator responses to novel aposematic prey, accounting for conspicuousness.
  • To determine if predators exhibit preferences independent of prey visual detection.
  • To assess the role of prey conspicuousness in predator attack rates.

Main Methods:

  • Field experiment using clay replicas of poison dart frogs (Dendrobates pumilio) and cryptic controls.
  • Modeling avian predator visual systems to estimate replica contrast.

More Related Videos

Manipulation of Color Patterns in Jumping Spiders for Use in Behavioral Experiments
09:03

Manipulation of Color Patterns in Jumping Spiders for Use in Behavioral Experiments

Published on: May 21, 2019

Assaying Predatory Feeding Behaviors in Pristionchus and Other Nematodes
06:27

Assaying Predatory Feeding Behaviors in Pristionchus and Other Nematodes

Published on: September 4, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2026

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents
06:25

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents

Published on: May 16, 2025

Manipulation of Color Patterns in Jumping Spiders for Use in Behavioral Experiments
09:03

Manipulation of Color Patterns in Jumping Spiders for Use in Behavioral Experiments

Published on: May 21, 2019

Assaying Predatory Feeding Behaviors in Pristionchus and Other Nematodes
06:27

Assaying Predatory Feeding Behaviors in Pristionchus and Other Nematodes

Published on: September 4, 2016

  • Measuring predation rates and analyzing them relative to conspicuousness.

    • Main Results:

    • Absolute predation rates did not differ significantly among prey color forms.
    • Predation rates, when adjusted for conspicuousness, deviated from expected values.
    • Deviations suggest predators make post-detection decisions, but the direction was model-dependent.

    Conclusions:

    • Accounting for prey conspicuousness is crucial for accurate predator behavior studies.
    • Existing models of avian visual systems may need refinement.
    • Predators exhibit complex post-detection decision-making processes.