Gastric adenocarcinoma: prognostic significance of several pathologic parameters and histologic classifications

Considerable controversy exists about the value of histologic classifications of gastric adenocarcinoma in the prediction of patient survival. Histologic sections of 75 consecutive gastrectomies were used to compare Lauren and Ming classifications with emphasis on clinical stage, size, location of tumor, desmoplasia, inflammatory reaction, and 5-year survival. Both classifications generally correlated and, when combined, proved helpful in defining certain cases. At surgery, about one third of the total cases of intestinal (INT, Lauren) and expanding (ET, Ming) were in early stages, whereas almost all the diffuse (DT, Lauren) and infiltrative (INF, Ming) types were in late stages. When the Lauren classification was applied to preoperative endoscopic biopsies, a 72% diagnostic correlation with the surgical specimens was found. Followup revealed no survivors of the DT and INF and 12 and 11 survivors of INT and ET, respectively, regardless of stage. Inflammatory response was associated with good prognosis. Desmoplasia and size had no prognostic significance. Tumors of the cardia had worse prognoses than those in the body or antrum. Both Lauren and Ming classifications, and especially the degree of inflammation, were significant in predicting survival. Lauren INT and Ming ET should be declared only when they are the sole or predominant features.