Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Conformity01:20

Conformity

Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the prevalence of...
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ensuring robust OSCE assessments: A reflective account from a Scottish school of nursing.

Nurse education in practice·2024
Same author

Can proactive support prevent unscheduled care? A controlled observational retrospective cohort study in cancer patients in Scotland.

BMC health services research·2024
Same author

Holistic needs assessment in outpatient cancer care: a randomised controlled trial.

BMJ open·2023
Same author

Can mental healthcare for Muslim patients be person-centred without consideration of religious identity? A concurrent analysis.

Nurse education in practice·2022
Same author

Men's perspectives of caring for a female partner with cancer: A longitudinal narrative study.

Health & social care in the community·2022
Same author

Chaplains Work in Primary Care.

Journal of health care chaplaincy·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2026

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

No decision about me without me: concordance operationalised.

Austyn Snowden1, Glenn Marland

  • 1School of Health, Nursing and Midwifery, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, UK. Austyn.snowden@uws.ac.uk

Journal of Clinical Nursing
|November 6, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Concordance in healthcare, a collaboration of knowledge and beliefs, offers better patient outcomes than adherence. It operationalizes shared decision-making, moving beyond the limitations of adherence-focused interventions.

More Related Videos

Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency
08:01

Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency

Published on: October 28, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2026

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency
08:01

Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency

Published on: October 28, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare decision-making
  • Patient-centered care
  • Health behavior

Background:

  • Concordance, defined as incorporating diverse views for coherent clinical decisions, is an ideal in nursing.
  • Current practice often prioritizes adherence over concordance due to time constraints and the difficulty of measuring deeper collaboration.
  • This focus on adherence overlooks the principle of 'no decision about me without me'.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate how concordance can be operationalized for patient benefit.
  • To argue against the prioritization of adherence as a primary clinical outcome.
  • To highlight the incoherence of adherence-focused strategies with patient-centered care rhetoric.

Main Methods:

  • Discursive analysis of current healthcare practices and guidelines.
  • Contrast of concordance-based approaches with adherence-based interventions.
  • Examination of the operationalization of concordance through knowledge, health beliefs, and collaboration.

Main Results:

  • Prioritizing adherence leads to problematic judgments of non-adherence, which are absent in concordance-focused consultations.
  • Concordance can be operationalized by viewing it as a composite of health beliefs, knowledge, and collaboration.
  • The framework of concordance can incorporate diverse patient behaviors, negating the need for adherence as a standalone endpoint.

Conclusions:

  • Concordance offers a more coherent and patient-centered approach compared to adherence.
  • Operationalizing concordance through shared knowledge, beliefs, and collaboration leads to more meaningful clinical outcomes.
  • The limitations of adherence-focused interventions, which are only partially successful, are overcome by embracing concordance.