Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice
Published on: January 9, 2019
Noise-induced changes in cochlear compression in the rat as indexed by forward masking of the auditory brainstem
Eric C Bielefeld1, Evelyn M Hoglund, Lawrence L Feth
1Department of Speech and Hearing Science, The Ohio State University, 110 Pressey Hall, 1070 Carmack Road, Columbus, OH 43220, USA. bielefeld.6@osu.edu
Abstract:
The current study was undertaken to investigate changes in forward masking patterns using on-frequency and off-frequency maskers of 7 and 10 kHz probes in the Sprague-Dawley rat. Off-frequency forward masking growth functions have been shown in humans to be non-linear, while on-frequency functions behave linearly. The non-linear nature of the off-frequency functions is attributable to active processing from the outer hair cells, and was therefore expected to be sensitive to noise-induced cochlear damage. For the study, nine Sprague-Dawley rats' auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) were recorded with and without forward maskers. Forward masker-induced changes in latency and amplitude of the initial positive peak of the rats' auditory brainstem responses were assessed with both off-frequency and on-frequency maskers. The rats were then exposed to a noise designed to induce 20-40 dB of permanent threshold shift. Twenty-one days after the noise exposure, the forward masking growth functions were measured to assess noise-induced changes in the off-frequency and on-frequency forward masking patterns. Pre-exposure results showed compressive non-linear masking effects of the off-frequency conditions on both latency and amplitude of the auditory brainstem response. The noise rendered the off-frequency forward masking patterns more linear, consistent with human behavioral findings. On- and off-frequency forward masking growth functions were calculated, and they displayed patterns consistent with human behavioral functions, both prior to noise and after the noise exposure.
More Related Videos
06:01Semi-Automated Analysis of Peak Amplitude and Latency for Auditory Brainstem Response Waveforms Using R
Published on: December 9, 2022
07:13Modified Experimental Conditions for Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Mice and Assessment of Hearing Function and Outer Hair Cell Damage
Published on: February 10, 2023