Related Experiment Videos
Staphylococcal bacteraemia and endocarditis and fusidic acid
1Department of Microbiology, United Medical School of Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Abstract:
In 1980, we reported an association between the use of fusidic acid (particularly the intravenous formulation) and jaundice in patients who had received the drug for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia during the previous 10 years. We have continued to use fusidic acid for severe staphylococcal infections, but have recommended oral administration whenever possible. In the earlier study the incidence of jaundice in patients given intravenous fusidic acid was 48%, but in the recent study of 145 patients it was 17%. Whereas 71% of patients receiving fusidic acid in the earlier series were given the intravenous drug (with or without oral) only 25% of patients were given the intravenous drug in the recent series. The incidence of jaundice in those patients treated only with the oral formulation was 13% in the earlier study and 6% in the recent study. Although jaundice was usually reversible, it is nevertheless an unwanted side effect. Resistance of S. aureus to fusidic acid remains at around 1%; it may be present on primary isolation or arise during treatment. This seems to occur particularly in patients with endocarditis or bone infection despite the use of fusidic acid in combination with another antibiotic. After some 25 years of clinical use, fusidic acid remains a most useful anti-staphylococcal antibiotic; the intravenous preparation should be avoided when possible.
Insights
Intravenous fusidic acid is linked to jaundice in Staphylococcus aureus infections. Switching to oral administration significantly reduces this risk, making it a safer option for patients.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology
- Infectious Diseases
- Hepatology
Background:
- Fusidic acid is a critical antibiotic for Staphylococcus aureus infections.
- Previous reports indicated an association between intravenous fusidic acid and jaundice.
- Concerns about drug-induced liver injury necessitate evaluating administration routes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the incidence of jaundice associated with fusidic acid use.
- To compare jaundice rates between intravenous and oral formulations.
- To evaluate the impact of administration route changes on patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of patient data on fusidic acid use for Staphylococcus aureus infections.
- Comparison of jaundice incidence in patients receiving intravenous versus oral fusidic acid.
- Review of patient records for adverse events, specifically jaundice.
Main Results:
- The incidence of jaundice decreased from 48% to 17% with reduced intravenous fusidic acid use.
- Jaundice rates were 13% (earlier) and 6% (recent) for oral-only administration.
- Intravenous administration was reduced from 71% to 25% of patients.
Conclusions:
- Reducing intravenous fusidic acid use significantly lowers the risk of jaundice.
- Oral fusidic acid is a safer alternative, with lower associated jaundice incidence.
- Intravenous fusidic acid should be avoided when possible due to its hepatotoxicity.