Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

09:16
Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
Published on: March 14, 2018
Performance of the Australian Developmental Screening Test in a clinical setting
Joanne Morris1, Deborah Perkins, Vanessa Sarkozy
1Department of Community Child Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health
|November 7, 2012
Summary
The Australian Developmental Screening Test (ADST) shows improved accuracy for detecting developmental concerns in children when using modified criteria, enhancing its clinical utility for early intervention.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Pediatrics
- Screening Tools
- Child Health Assessment
Background:
- Early detection of developmental concerns is crucial for timely intervention.
- The Australian Developmental Screening Test (ADST) is used to identify children needing further assessment.
- Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of screening tools in real-world clinical settings is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the ADST in a clinical setting.
- To assess the ADST's effectiveness in identifying developmental concerns requiring further evaluation or treatment.
Main Methods:
- Children with developmental concerns were assessed using the ADST.
- The Griffiths Mental Developmental Scales (GMDS) served as the gold standard for comparison.
- Data were analyzed to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios.
Main Results:
- The standard ADST criteria yielded a sensitivity of 95% but a low specificity of 52%.
- Modified ADST criteria, adjusted for age groups (under 2 years and 2+ years), significantly improved specificity to 82% while maintaining 95% sensitivity.
- The revised criteria resulted in a positive likelihood ratio of 5.24 and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.06.
Conclusions:
- Modified ADST criteria demonstrate improved diagnostic accuracy for developmental problems in a referred population.
- These enhanced criteria show promise for more reliable screening of developmental concerns.
- Further validation in diverse populations is recommended to confirm the generalizability of the modified criteria.

