Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

07:07
Development of a Direct Pulp-capping Model for the Evaluation of Pulpal Wound Healing and Reparative Dentin Formation in Mice
Published on: January 12, 2017
Direct pulp-capping with calcium enriched mixture in primary molar teeth: a randomized clinical trial
Masoud Fallahinejad Ghajari1, Tahereh Asgharian Jeddi, Sonay Iri
1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental Research Center/Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Iranian Endodontic Journal
|November 7, 2012
Summary
Direct pulp capping (DPC) with Calcium Enriched Mixture (CEM) cement and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) showed similar clinical and radiographic success rates in primary molars. Both biomaterials are effective for DPC in young children.
Area of Science:
- Dentistry
- Pediatric Dentistry
- Dental Materials Science
Background:
- Direct pulp capping (DPC) is a vital dental procedure for preserving pulp vitality in primary teeth.
- Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) is a widely used biomaterial for DPC, but novel alternatives are being explored.
- Calcium Enriched Mixture (CEM) cement presents a new option for DPC in pediatric dental care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical and radiographic success rates of DPC using CEM cement versus MTA.
- To evaluate the efficacy of CEM cement as a direct pulp capping agent in primary molar teeth.
- To provide evidence-based recommendations for biomaterial selection in pediatric DPC.
Main Methods:
- A randomized clinical trial involving 42 primary molars in 21 children aged 5-8 years.
- Blinded assessment of operators and patients, with teeth randomly assigned to either CEM cement or MTA groups.
- Standardized caries removal, pulp exposure management, biomaterial capping, amalgam restoration, and 6-month follow-up with clinical and radiographic evaluations.
Main Results:
- Thirty-eight teeth completed the 6-month follow-up (19 per group).
- Radiographic evaluations showed no failures in either group.
- Clinical success rates were 94.8% for CEM cement and 100% for MTA; one sinus tract was noted in the CEM group. Dentinal bridge formation was not observed in either group.
Conclusions:
- No statistically significant difference in treatment outcomes between CEM cement and MTA for DPC in primary molars.
- Both CEM cement and MTA demonstrate successful clinical and radiographic performance for direct pulp capping in primary teeth.
- CEM cement is a viable alternative to MTA for direct pulp capping procedures in pediatric dentistry.