Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Somatic to iPS Cell Reprogramming01:29

Somatic to iPS Cell Reprogramming

Reprogramming alters the gene expression in somatic cells, transforming them into induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells over several generations. Scientists can reprogram cells by introducing genes for four transcription factors—Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc (OSKM) by viral or non-viral methods. These factors are also known as Yamanaka factors after Shinya Yamanaka, who first generated iPS cells using mouse skin cells. Yamanaka was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2012 for this...
Methods of Nuclear Reprogramming01:24

Methods of Nuclear Reprogramming

Nuclear reprogramming is a process of transforming one cell type into an unrelated cell type by epigenetic changes that alter the cell’s original gene expression pattern. Such epigenetic changes force cells to express a different set of genes, which play a significant role in inducing transformation into other cell types. Nuclear reprogramming offers applications in reproductive cloning for livestock propagation and regenerative medicine — developing patient-specific cells for injury repair.
Introduction to Nuclear Reprogramming01:14

Introduction to Nuclear Reprogramming

Nuclear reprogramming is the process of switching gene expression of one cell type to that of another cell type, usually from a differentiated cell state to an undifferentiated cell state. Differentiation occurs during processes such as development and morphogenesis, tissue regeneration, and malignancy. Cells can also be artificially induced to reprogram their gene expression by techniques such as nuclear transfer, induced pluripotency, and cell fusion. Such techniques have many applications in...
Forced Transdifferentiation01:28

Forced Transdifferentiation

Transdifferentiation, also known as lineage reprogramming, was first discovered by Selman and Kafatos in 1974 in silkmoths. They observed that the moths’ cuticle-producing cells transformed into salt-producing cells. Many such cases of natural transdifferentiation occur in organisms. In humans, pancreatic alpha cells can become beta cells. In newts, the loss of the eye’s lens causes the pigmented epithelial cells to transdifferentiate into the lens cells.
Artificial transdifferentiation occurs...
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells01:06

Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Stem cells are undifferentiated cells that divide and produce different cell types. Ordinarily, cells that have differentiated into a specific cell type are terminally differentiated; however, scientists have found a way to reprogram these mature cells so that they dedifferentiate and return to an unspecialized, proliferative state. These cells are pluripotent like embryonic stem cells—able to produce all cell types—and are called induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs).
Somatic cells are...
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells01:13

Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Stem cells are undifferentiated cells that divide and produce different types of cells. Ordinarily, cells that have differentiated into a specific cell type are post-mitotic—that is, they no longer divide. However, scientists have found a way to reprogram these mature cells so that they “de-differentiate” and return to an unspecialized, proliferative state. These cells are also pluripotent like embryonic stem cells—able to produce all cell types—and are therefore called induced pluripotent stem...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Retrospective Evaluation of the Association of Pulmonary Contusion Volume as Assessed by Computed Tomography With Mortality and Provision of Mechanical Ventilation in Traumatized Dogs (2019-2023): 27 Cases.

Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)·2026
Same author

Enterococcus faecalis induces MHC-II expression by the intestinal epithelium during murine graft-versus-host disease.

Blood·2025
Same author

Burst that Bubble. Gastric Perforation from an Ingested Intragastric Balloon: A Case Report.

Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine·2024
Same author

Preservative Effect of Alga Flour Extract on Frozen Horse Mackerel (<i>Trachurus trachurus</i>) Lipids.

Foods (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

On-Axis Optical Trapping with Vortex Beams: The Role of the Multipolar Decomposition.

ACS photonics·2024
Same author

Complete chloroplast genome of the marine red alga <i>Rhodochorton tenue</i> (Rhodochortonaceae, Rhodophyta) from San Juan Island, Washington.

Microbiology resource announcements·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2026

In vivo Reprogramming of Adult Somatic Cells to Pluripotency by Overexpression of Yamanaka Factors
12:12

In vivo Reprogramming of Adult Somatic Cells to Pluripotency by Overexpression of Yamanaka Factors

Published on: December 17, 2013

[Ethical reflections on cell reprogramming].

Justo Aznar Lucea1, Miriam Martínez

  • 1Instituto de Ciencias de la Vida de la Universidad Católica de Valencia, España. justo.aznar@ucv.es

Cuadernos De Bioetica : Revista Oficial De La Asociacion Espanola De Bioetica Y Etica Medica
|November 8, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells) offer an ethical alternative to embryonic stem cells. However, new reproductive applications raise ongoing ethical concerns, necessitating continued debate.

More Related Videos

Cell Surface Marker Mediated Purification of iPS Cell Intermediates from a Reprogrammable Mouse Model
10:32

Cell Surface Marker Mediated Purification of iPS Cell Intermediates from a Reprogrammable Mouse Model

Published on: September 6, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2026

In vivo Reprogramming of Adult Somatic Cells to Pluripotency by Overexpression of Yamanaka Factors
12:12

In vivo Reprogramming of Adult Somatic Cells to Pluripotency by Overexpression of Yamanaka Factors

Published on: December 17, 2013

Cell Surface Marker Mediated Purification of iPS Cell Intermediates from a Reprogrammable Mouse Model
10:32

Cell Surface Marker Mediated Purification of iPS Cell Intermediates from a Reprogrammable Mouse Model

Published on: September 6, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Stem Cell Biology
  • Bioethics
  • Regenerative Medicine

Context:

  • Ethical concerns surrounding human embryonic stem cell use.
  • Advancements in cell reprogramming technologies.
  • Development of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells).

Purpose:

  • Evaluate the ethical journey of iPS cell discovery.
  • Examine the ethical implications of iPS cell applications.
  • Analyze the ethical challenges posed by new iPS cell uses, particularly in reproduction.

Summary:

  • iPS cells provide a promising alternative to ethically contentious human embryonic stem cells.
  • The paper reviews the historical development and ethical considerations of iPS cell research.
  • Emerging reproductive applications of iPS cells introduce new ethical dilemmas.

Impact:

  • Highlights the ongoing ethical debate surrounding iPS cell technology.
  • Informs discussions on the responsible use of regenerative medicine.
  • Underscores the need for ethical guidelines in stem cell research and clinical applications.