Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

A Retrograde Implantation Approach for Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Placement in Mice
Published on: July 20, 2022
The evolving ethics of infant dialysis
John D Lantos1, Bradley A Warady
1Children's Mercy Hospital, University of Missouri, 2401 Gillham Road, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA. jlantos@cmh.edu
Insights
Renal replacement therapy for infants with end-stage renal disease is often optional due to family burdens and uncertain outcomes. Further research is needed for ethical infant dialysis decisions.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nephrology
- Medical Ethics
- Bioethics
Background:
- End-stage renal disease (ESRD) in infants presents complex ethical challenges.
- Renal replacement therapy (RRT) has become more common for infants over the past two decades.
- Despite increased availability, RRT for infants is often considered optional by healthcare providers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review ethical considerations in clinical decisions regarding RRT for infants with ESRD.
- To explore reasons why RRT for infants remains a desirable but non-obligatory treatment.
- To compare infant RRT ethical dilemmas with other pediatric clinical situations.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of ethical issues in pediatric nephrology.
- Analysis of factors influencing RRT decisions for infants with ESRD.
- Comparative ethical analysis with other pediatric subspecialties.
Main Results:
- RRT for infants with ESRD is viewed as optional, not mandatory, by clinicians.
- Family burden and outcome uncertainty contribute to the non-obligatory status of infant RRT.
- Ethical considerations for infant RRT share similarities and differences with other pediatric cases.
Conclusions:
- The non-obligatory nature of infant RRT is influenced by significant family burdens and treatment outcome uncertainties.
- A clear ethical framework is needed to guide RRT decisions for infants with ESRD.
- Further research is crucial to address ethical questions surrounding infant dialysis.
Abstract:
In this paper, we review ethical issues that arise when families and doctors face clinical decisions about renal replacement therapy for an infant with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Over the last 20 years, many centers have begun to routinely offer renal replacement therapy. However, doctors and nurses both continue to view such therapy as optional, rather than mandatory. We speculate that the burdens of therapy on the family, and the uncertainties about satisfactory outcomes have led to a situation in which renal replacement therapy remains desirable, but non-obligatory. We discuss the reasons why this is likely to remain so, and the ways in which renal replacement therapy for infants with ESRD is similar to, or different from, other clinical situations in pediatrics. Finally, we propose a research agenda to answer questions that are crucial to making good ethical decisions about infant dialysis.
Related Concept Videos
Dialysis
Acute kidney injury develops suddenly and can be caused by pre-renal causes (e.g., hypovolemia, shock), intrinsic renal causes (e.g., acute tubular necrosis), or post-renal causes (e.g., urinary obstruction). In contrast, chronic renal failure progresses gradually over time and is often...
Dialysis
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Dilemmas II