Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

A Rat Graft Rejection Model of Intestinal Transplantation with Exteriorized Ileostomy for Longitudinal Prognosis Assessment
Published on: June 10, 2025
Adaptive functioning and its correlates after intestine and liver transplantation
Diana A Shellmer1, Annette DeVito Dabbs, Mary Amanda Dew
1Department of Pediatric Transplant Surgery, School of Medicine University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. diana.shellmer@chp.edu
Pediatric intestine transplant recipients showed lower adaptive functioning than liver transplant recipients. Caregiver education and transplant type significantly impact these outcomes, necessitating targeted interventions.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Transplant Surgery
- Developmental Psychology
Background:
- Pediatric solid organ transplantation, including intestine (ITX) and liver (LTX) transplants, is a life-saving procedure.
- Assessing non-medical outcomes like adaptive functioning is crucial for long-term patient well-being.
- Previous research has focused on medical outcomes, with less emphasis on daily living skills post-transplant.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare adaptive functioning levels between pediatric ITX and LTX recipients.
- To identify factors correlating with adaptive functioning in these pediatric populations.
- To inform clinical practice regarding post-transplant care and support.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional study design.
- Inclusion of 18 ITX and 22 LTX recipients transplanted between June 2003 and March 2009.
- Utilized the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System, Second Edition (ABAS-II) completed by family caregivers.
- Collected socio-demographic and transplant-related data.
Main Results:
- ITX recipients demonstrated significantly lower overall adaptive functioning and subdomain scores compared to LTX recipients (p ≤ 0.04).
- Both ITX and LTX patients scored significantly lower than the general population normative mean (p ≤ 0.003).
- Key correlates of adaptive functioning included transplant type (r = -0.4, p = 0.02), recipient gender (r = 0.4, p = 0.01), and caregiver educational level (r = 0.5, p = 0.003), explaining 45% of the variance.
Conclusions:
- Pediatric ITX recipients exhibit poorer adaptive functioning compared to LTX recipients.
- Transplant type, recipient gender, and caregiver education are significant predictors of adaptive functioning.
- Ongoing monitoring and tailored interventions are essential to improve daily functioning outcomes for pediatric transplant survivors.
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Tissue Transplantation
The Biology of Tissue Transplantation
The biology of tissue transplantation hinges on the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules. These molecules...
Cell-mediated Immune Responses
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure

