Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

06:36
Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
Published on: March 14, 2025
[Effect of different orthodontic interproximal reduction methods on the enamel]
Chuan-liang Shu1, Xin-qiang Liu, Gui-feng Wang
1Department of Stomatology, No.401 Hospital of PLA, Qingdao 266071, Shandong Province, China. 33647904@qq.com
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue = Shanghai Journal of Stomatology
|November 9, 2012
Summary
Interproximal enamel reduction (IER) using chemical polishing with orthophosphoric acid and a polishing system showed superior results compared to mechanical methods alone. Enamel surface scratches from IER are difficult to repair, even after remineralization.
Area of Science:
- Dental materials science
- Biomaterials engineering
- Oral health research
Background:
- Interproximal enamel reduction (IER) is a common orthodontic procedure.
- Evaluating the effectiveness and surface integrity after different IER methods is crucial for clinical application.
- Understanding the long-term effects of IER on enamel surface properties is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the most suitable interproximal enamel reduction (IER) method for clinical use.
- To compare the effects of mechanical and chemo-mechanical IER techniques on enamel surface microhardness and morphology.
- To assess enamel surface changes after in vitro pH cycling following IER.
Main Methods:
- Fifty human premolars were sectioned and divided into five groups: stripping strip, stripping disk, stripping strip with chemical polish, stripping disk with chemical polish, and a control.
- Samples underwent 30 days of in vitro pH cycling.
- Enamel surface microhardness was measured, and surface morphology was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Main Results:
- Significant differences in enamel microhardness and surface morphology were observed between the groups (ANOVA, P<0.05).
- Chemo-mechanical IER groups (using orthophosphoric acid and polishing system) showed superior surface quality compared to mechanical methods alone.
- No significant difference was found between stripping strip and stripping disk methods when used alone or with chemical polishing.
Conclusions:
- Mechanical IER methods (stripping strip and disk) show no significant difference in effectiveness.
- Combining mechanical reduction with chemical polishing (35% orthophosphoric acid and polishing system) yields better enamel surface results.
- Scratches on the enamel surface resulting from IER are persistent and show limited repair even after in vitro remineralization.