Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

Enhanced Communication of Tumor Margins Using 3D Scanning and Mapping
Published on: December 15, 2023
Tumor scatter after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: are we dealing with an invisible margin?
Dana M Hayden1, Shriram Jakate, Maria C Mora Pinzon
1Department of General Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA. dhayden21@gmail.com
Background:
After the impressive response of rectal cancers to neoadjuvant therapy, it seems reasonable to ask: can we can excise the small ulcer locally or avoid a radical resection if there is no gross residual tumor? Does gross response reflect what happens to tumor cells microscopically after radiation?
Objective:
The aim of this study was to identify microscopic tumor cell response to radiation.
Design:
This study is a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database.
Setting:
This investigation was conducted at a single tertiary medical center.
Patients:
Patients were selected who had elective radical resection for rectal cancer after preoperative chemotherapy and radiation performed by 2 colorectal surgeons between 2006 and 2011.
Main Outcome Measures:
The primary outcome measured was tumor presence after radiation therapy
Results:
Of the 75 patients, 20 patients were complete responders and 55 had residual cancer. Of these patients, 28 had no tumor cells seen outside the gross ulcer, and 27 (49.1%) had tumor outside the visible ulcer or microscopic tumor present with no overlying ulcer. Of these tumors, 81.5% were skewed away from the ulcer center. The mean distance of distal scatter was 1.0 cm from the visible ulcer edge to a maximum of 3 cm; 3 patients had tumor cells more than 2 cm distal to the visible ulcer edge. Tumor scatter outside the ulcer was not associated with poor prognostic factors, such as nodal and distant disease, perineural invasion, or mucin; however, it was associated with lymphovascular invasion (χ2 = 4.12, p = 0.038)
Limitations:
There was limited access to clinical information gathered outside our institution.
Conclusions:
Our study suggests that 1) after radiation, the gross ulcer cannot be used to determine the sole area of potential residual tumor, 2) cancer cells may be found up to 3 cm distally from the gross ulcer, so the traditional 2-cm margin may not be adequate, and 3) local excision of the ulcer or no excision after apparent complete response appears to be insufficient treatment for rectal cancer.
More Related Videos
04:09The Pocket-Creation Procedure of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Large Rectal Laterally Spreading Tumors
Published on: February 13, 2026
11:05Tissue-simulating Phantoms for Assessing Potential Near-infrared Fluorescence Imaging Applications in Breast Cancer Surgery
Published on: September 19, 2014