Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Equity Theory01:26

Equity Theory

Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective01:23

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Evolutionary Psychology01:20

Evolutionary Psychology

Evolutionary psychology explores the origins of human behavior and mental processes by framing them within the context of natural selection, a theory famously propounded by Charles Darwin. This field asserts that many behaviors common across human societies — ranging from instinctive fear reactions to complex social interactions — arose as evolutionary adaptations. These adaptations enhanced the survival and reproductive success of our ancestors, thereby becoming embedded in the human psyche...
Self-Serving Bias01:29

Self-Serving Bias

Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
Compensation Mechanisms01:28

Compensation Mechanisms

The human body employs intricate mechanisms to counteract changes in blood pH, preventing conditions like acidosis (pH < 7.35) and alkalosis (pH > 7.45). These compensatory responses aim to restore normal arterial blood pH by engaging respiratory or renal systems, depending on the source of the imbalance.
Respiratory Compensation
This mechanism addresses metabolic-induced pH imbalances by adjusting breathing rates. Respiratory compensation begins within minutes of detecting a pH...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Testing evolutionary theories of human cooperation via meta-analysis of microfinance repayment.

Evolutionary human sciences·2026
Same author

Kin Selection Underpins Family Dynamics in Rural China.

Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

EHS editorial 2025.

Evolutionary human sciences·2026
Same author

Prevalence of mental health in relation to religious practices in a contemporary small-scale older Amdo Tibetans.

PLOS mental health·2026
Same author

Discrepancies in Self-reporting of Bride Kidnapping in Kyrgyzstan : Concealment or misperception?

Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Skewed sex ratios and violence against women in Pakistan.

Evolutionary human sciences·2025
Same journal

Chronic limb loading results in remarkable load carriage economy in growing fowl.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Motion-from-structure in face perception: expectations of natural face motion depend on face shape.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Unification and generalization of models of zygote survival.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Phenological type- and diameter-dependent effects of individual light availability and interannual climate variation on tree growth.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Interaction range of common goods shapes Black Queen dynamics beyond the cheater-cooperator narrative.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Stingray spine diversity reflects performance trade-offs linked to puncture and breakability.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2026

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

The evolution of fairness: explaining variation in bargaining behaviour.

Shakti Lamba1, Ruth Mace

  • 1Department of Anthropology, University College London, 14 Taviton Street, London WC1H 0BW, UK. s.lamba@exeter.ac.uk

Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|November 9, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Fairness conceptions vary globally. This study found that fairness preferences within the Pahari Korwa people in India did not align with cultural norms, suggesting local environments, not ethnic groups, shape fairness views.

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2026

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Human evolutionary biology
  • Cultural anthropology
  • Behavioral economics

Background:

  • Global conceptions of fairness are diverse, yet the drivers of this variation remain unclear.
  • Fairness preferences are often assumed to reflect cultural norms, but this hypothesis lacks empirical testing.
  • Understanding fairness evolution requires identifying the selective pressures and mechanisms shaping human cooperation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To empirically test whether fairness norms operate at the ethno-linguistic group level.
  • To investigate the scale at which cultural transmission maintains fairness preferences.
  • To identify factors influencing variations in human fairness conceptions.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of behavioral data from 21 populations of the Pahari Korwa ethno-linguistic group in central India.
  • Examination of cultural conformism and behavioral homogeneity within the group.
  • Assessment of expectation coordination in bargaining scenarios.

Main Results:

  • Neither behavioral homogeneity within the ethno-linguistic group nor coordinated expectations between bargainers were observed.
  • Fairness preferences did not consistently align with broader cultural or ethnic group norms.
  • Variation in fairness conceptions was evident even within the same ethno-linguistic group.

Conclusions:

  • Fairness norms may not be maintained at the ethno-linguistic group level.
  • Individual conceptions of fairness appear to be influenced by factors operating at a smaller scale than the ethno-linguistic group.
  • Local environmental factors likely play a significant role in shaping individuals' fairness preferences and resource division expectations.