Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...
Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback01:24

Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback

Self-esteem is intricately tied to our perception of competence and our ability to exert control over our lives. One of the primary sources of this perception is performance feedback — the ongoing evaluation of our actions in terms of success and failure. According to Franks and Marolla (1976), people derive self-worth from experiencing themselves as causal agents, capable of achieving goals and overcoming obstacles. This process nurtures a critical component of self-esteem: self-efficacy,...
Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Environmental sustainability in palliative care: a narrative review.

Annals of palliative medicine·2026
Same author

Providing a safety net: a qualitative study on supporting medical students during goals of care discussions.

Canadian medical education journal·2026
Same author

Association Between Physician Licensing and Certification Examination Performance and Quality of Patient Care: A Systematic Review.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same author

Understanding Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Within Canadian Radiation Oncology Training Programs: A National Survey of Residents and Fellows.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2025
Same author

Diversity and Experiences of Radiation Oncologists in Canada: A Survey of Gender Identity, Sexual Orientation, Disability, Race, Ethnicity, Religion, and Workplace Discrimination-A National Cross-Sectional Electronic Survey.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2025
Same author

"Hope is strong": a qualitative inquiry into serious illness conversations for patients living with structural vulnerabilities and substance use disorders.

BMC palliative care·2025
Same journal

Self-regulated learning and academic success in health professions students: A systematic review.

Medical teacher·2026
Same journal

A response to: 'the hallucination of learning with generative artificial intelligence'.

Medical teacher·2026
Same journal

Beyond "student-led": Toward an entrustment framework for faculty involvement in student-led OSCEs.

Medical teacher·2026
Same journal

When what we can count is all that counts.

Medical teacher·2026
Same journal

Reframing interprofessional competencies through Ubuntu: A decolonial proposal.

Medical teacher·2026
Same journal

Uncovering the economic costs of rotation in postgraduate clinical training: A UK case study using a novel methodology.

Medical teacher·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Quality evaluation reports: Can a faculty development program make a difference?

Nancy L Dudek1, Meridith B Marks, Timothy J Wood

  • 1Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, The Rehabilitation Centre, 505 Smyth Road, Room 1105D, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M2, Canada. ndudek@ottawahospital.on.ca

Medical Teacher
|November 13, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Faculty development workshops can improve the quality of clinical evaluation reports. Training supervisors enhances trainee assessment, a key component of medical education quality.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Faculty Development
  • Assessment Quality

Background:

  • Concerns exist regarding the quality of clinical evaluation reports for medical students and residents.
  • The impact of faculty development (FD) interventions on report quality remains uncertain.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if faculty can be trained to produce higher-quality clinical evaluation reports.

Main Methods:

  • A 3-hour interactive faculty development program was delivered at three Canadian medical schools.
  • Three blinded, independent raters evaluated report quality using the Completed Clinical Evaluation Report Rating (CCERR) scale.
  • Pre- and post-workshop reports from 22 supervisors were assessed.

Main Results:

  • The mean CCERR score for post-workshop reports was significantly higher than for pre-workshop reports (21.74 ± 4.91 vs. 18.90 ± 5.00, p = 0.02).

Conclusions:

  • The faculty development workshop positively impacted evaluation report quality.
  • Faculty can be effectively trained to improve trainee assessment.
  • Faculty development is crucial for enhancing the quality of medical assessments.