Line bisection error predicts the presence and severity of neglect dyslexia in paragraph reading

Cancellation tasks and line bisection tasks are commonly used to diagnose spatial neglect after right hemisphere lesions. In such tasks, neglect patients often show leftsided omissions of targets in cancellation tests as well as a pathological rightward deviation in horizontal line bisection. However, double dissociations have also been reported and the relation between performance in both tasks is not clear. Another impairment frequently associated with the neglect syndrome are omissions or misread initial letters of single words, a phenomenon termed neglect dyslexia (ND). Omissions of whole words on the contralesional side of the page are generally considered as egocentric or space-based errors, whereas misreadings of the left part of a word in ND can be viewed as a type of stimulus-centered or word-based, perceptual error. As words, sentences and horizontal lines have a similar spatial layout in the sense that they all are horizontally aligned, long stimuli with a canonical left-right orientation (with a defined beginning on the left and an end on the right side), we hypothesized a significant association between the horizontal line bisection error (LBE) in neglect and the extent (number) of neglected or substituted letters within single words in ND (neglect dyslexia extension, NDE). To this purpose, we computed Center-of-Cancellation (CoC) scores in a cancellation task as well as Center-of-Reading (CoR) scores in an experimental paragraph reading test. We found that the CoR was a better indicator for egocentric word omissions than the CoC in a group of 17 patients with left visuospatial neglect. Furthermore, the LBE predicted the severity of ND, indicated by highly significant correlations between the LBE and the extent of the neglected letter string within single words (NDE; r=0.73, p<0.001) as well as between the LBE and the frequency of ND errors (r=0.61; p=0.009). In contrast, we found no significant correlation between the CoC and the severity of ND. These results indicate two different pathological mechanisms being responsible for contralesional spatial neglect and ND. In conclusion, the LBE is a more sensitive predictor of the presence and severity of the reading disorder in spatial neglect than conventional cancellation tasks.