Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

Treatment with Locking Intramedullary Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur Utilizing a New Awl with a Distal Positioner
Published on: June 6, 2025
Immediate intramedullary flexible nailing of open pediatric tibial shaft fractures
Nirav K Pandya1, Eric W Edmonds
1Department of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Children's Hospital and Research Center Oakland, University of California San Francisco, Oakland, CA, USA.
Background:
Flexible nailing has become the preferred implant for pediatric patients with tibial shaft fractures that require operative fixation. Immediate definitive fracture fixation with flexible nails in patients with high-energy, open fractures has not been examined. The purpose of our study was to determine if immediate flexible nailing of open pediatric tibial shaft fractures is safe and efficacious from a bone healing, wound, and infectious standpoint.
Methods:
A retrospective review of 26 tibial shaft fractures consecutively treated with flexible nailing at our institution from 2003 to 2010 was performed. Age, mechanism of injury, associated injuries, presence of compartment syndrome, antibiotic administration, systemic insults, time to union, as well as bone healing (nonunion, delayed union, malunion, leg length discrepancy, growth arrest), wound, and infectious complications were collected. Comparisons were made between patients with open fractures and those with closed fractures.
Results:
We identified 14 patients with open fractures and a control group of 12 patients with closed injuries who underwent flexible nailing. Patients with open fractures were more likely to have polytraumatic injuries (71.0% vs. 25.0%, P = 0.04). There was no difference (P = 1.0) in the rates of compartment syndrome (open = 14.0%, closed = 17.0%) between the 2 groups. Systemic complications (pulmonary compromise and increased intracranial pressure) were noted in 2 patients who underwent immediate nailing of their open fractures; both of whom had closed head injuries. There was no difference (P = 1.0) in the rates of wound/infectious complications between the open (7.0%) and closed (4.0%) fractures groups, with no cases of wound breakdown or osteomyelitis. There was an increased rate (P = 0.02) of bone healing complications in the open fracture group (21.0% vs. 4.0%); all in patients with Gustilo type 2 or 3 injuries. All patients achieved radiographic union at final follow-up.
Conclusions:
Immediate flexible nailing of open pediatric tibial shaft fractures can be safely performed with minimal risk of wound or infectious complications. Clinicians should understand that prolonged bone healing (particularly in Gustilo type 2 or 3 injuries) should be expected in patients who undergo immediate flexible nailing of their open fractures. Open tibial shaft fractures are high-energy injuries, and should be seen as surrogate markers of polytrauma in the pediatric population. The risk of compartment syndrome is high regardless of whether a patient has a closed or open tibia fracture, and caution should be used in performing flexible nailing in patients who may have closed head injury due to a risk of systemic complications.
Level Of Evidence:
Level III, therapeutic study, retrospective cohort.
More Related Videos
07:35Creating Rigidly Stabilized Fractures for Assessing Intramembranous Ossification, Distraction Osteogenesis, or Healing of Critical Sized Defects
Published on: April 11, 2012
07:41An Intramedullary Locking Nail for Standardized Fixation of Femur Osteotomies to Analyze Normal and Defective Bone Healing in Mice
Published on: November 13, 2016