Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Derivatives: Problem Solving01:26

Derivatives: Problem Solving

Temperature-Dependent Growth of Brook TroutThe growth of brook trout is closely influenced by water temperature. Experimental data demonstrate how trout weight changes over a 24-day period in response to varying water temperatures. At lower temperatures, such as 15.5 degrees Celsius, brook trout show significant weight gain. However, as the temperature increases, the amount of weight gained steadily decreases. At the highest temperature measured, 24.4 degrees Celsius, trout experience a net...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A critical perspective on the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry's adherence to founding principles-opportunities for the future.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2025
Same author

Screening causal assessment of brook trout occurrence and road runoff.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2025
Same author

Letter to the Editor on Brent et al. (2022): "A Novel Approach to Developing Thresholds for Total Dissolved Solids Using Standardized and Experimental Toxicity Test Methods".

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2024
Same author

Response to comments by Barnhart and Flinders on the US Environmental Protection Agency's field-based method for deriving benchmark values for protection of freshwater communities from excess major ions.

Integrated environmental assessment and management·2023
Same author

Advancing the science of a read-across framework for evaluation of data-poor chemicals incorporating systematic and new approach methods.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2022
Same author

Clearly weighing the evidence in read-across can improve assessments of data-poor chemicals.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2022
Same journal

From laboratory to the field: the role of microplastics as vectors of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the environment.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2026
Same journal

Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) exposure assessment of Carolina wren (Thryothorus ludovicianus) and barn swallow (Hirundo rustica) eggs and nestlings collected along Snow Creek and Choccolocco Creek watersheds near Anniston, Alabama, USA.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2026
Same journal

Domestic dog exposure to glyphosate in Australia.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2026
Same journal

Toxicity of green energy by-products beryllium and tungsten to temperate freshwater species from a Global Biodiversity Hotspot.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2026
Same journal

Biomagnification of Mercury in Wolves and Their Prey in the Northwest Territories, Canada.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2026
Same journal

Can forensic aggregate exposure pathways support exposure evaluation in toxic torts?

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 16, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

A method for deriving water-quality benchmarks using field data.

Susan M Cormier1, Glenn W Suter

  • 1National Center for Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
|November 14, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a method to assess environmental impacts on aquatic genera, identifying the concentration affecting 5% of species. This approach protects 95% of genera by defining extirpation as the absence of a genus in samples.

More Related Videos

Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds
12:50

Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds

Published on: September 26, 2017

Continuous Hydrologic and Water Quality Monitoring of Vernal Ponds
06:37

Continuous Hydrologic and Water Quality Monitoring of Vernal Ponds

Published on: November 13, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 16, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds
12:50

Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds

Published on: September 26, 2017

Continuous Hydrologic and Water Quality Monitoring of Vernal Ponds
06:37

Continuous Hydrologic and Water Quality Monitoring of Vernal Ponds

Published on: November 13, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Environmental toxicology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental chemistry

Background:

  • Field studies offer comprehensive environmental data, including species interactions.
  • Laboratory studies have limitations in replicating complex ecosystems.
  • Existing methodologies may not fully capture real-world environmental stressors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a methodology for characterizing genus-specific field effects.
  • To estimate environmental concentrations protecting 95% of aquatic genera.
  • To utilize ionic strength (specific conductance) as an example for the methodology.

Main Methods:

  • Defining extirpation as the threshold above which only 5% of genus observations occur.
  • Rank-ordering genus extirpation concentrations from least to greatest.
  • Estimating the 5th percentile benchmark using two-point interpolation.
  • Employing a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-recognized approach.

Main Results:

  • The methodology successfully characterizes field-observed effects on individual genera.
  • A benchmark concentration is estimated to protect 95% of genera.
  • The model broadly characterizes taxonomic sensitivity across a concentration gradient.

Conclusions:

  • Field observations provide invaluable data for ecological risk assessment.
  • The described methodology offers a robust way to establish environmental protection benchmarks.
  • This approach enhances the understanding of species' responses to environmental stressors in natural settings.