Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Phase Contrast and Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy01:26

Phase Contrast and Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy

11.9K
Phase-Contrast Microscopes
In-phase-contrast microscopes, interference between light directly passing through a cell and light refracted by cellular components is used to create high-contrast, high-resolution images without staining. It is the oldest and simplest type of microscope that creates an image by altering the wavelengths of light rays passing through the specimen. Altered wavelength paths are created using an annular stop in the condenser. The annular stop produces a hollow cone of...
11.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Screening for Patients With Diabetic Retinopathy and Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Family Medicine and Geriatric and Gerontology Care: Protocol for a Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial.

JMIR research protocols·2026
Same author

Association between probiotic prescriptions and the incidence of primary open-angle glaucoma in patients with documented dry eye.

Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie·2026
Same author

Association of Tirzepatide versus Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists with Incident Glaucoma in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Ophthalmology science·2026
Same author

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Age-related Macular Degeneration Risk in Diabetes or Non-diabetic Obesity: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

The American journal of medicine·2026
Same author

RANKL Inhibition and the Risk of Ocular Hypertension and Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same author

Refractive outcomes following anti-VEGF, vitrectomy, cryotherapy, and laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Frontiers in medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler SLPS Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses
06:55

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler SLPS Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses

Published on: June 6, 2017

7.9K

Intraocular lens power measured by partial coherence interferometry.

Yi-Ting Hsieh1, I-Jong Wang

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Taipei Branch, New Taipei, Taiwan.

Optometry and Vision Science : Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry
|November 14, 2012
PubMed
Summary

The Zeiss IOLMaster provides more accurate intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations than traditional methods. Its keratometry measurements are also superior, even for eyes unresponsive to IOLMaster biometry.

More Related Videos

The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry
12:14

The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry

Published on: August 12, 2013

22.4K
Integrated Photoacoustic Ophthalmoscopy and Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography
11:21

Integrated Photoacoustic Ophthalmoscopy and Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography

Published on: January 15, 2013

11.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler SLPS Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses
06:55

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler SLPS Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses

Published on: June 6, 2017

7.9K
The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry
12:14

The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry

Published on: August 12, 2013

22.4K
Integrated Photoacoustic Ophthalmoscopy and Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography
11:21

Integrated Photoacoustic Ophthalmoscopy and Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography

Published on: January 15, 2013

11.9K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Biometry
  • Optical Engineering

Background:

  • Accurate intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation is crucial for successful cataract surgery outcomes.
  • Traditional biometry and keratometry methods have limitations in precision.
  • Personalized optimization aims to improve refractive predictability after IOL implantation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the refractive prediction accuracy of the Zeiss IOLMaster against conventional automated keratometry and acoustic biometry.
  • To evaluate the performance of these devices after personalized optimization of IOL power calculations.
  • To determine the superiority of specific devices for IOL power calculation in various clinical scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective study involving 320 eyes of 249 patients undergoing phacoemulsification and IOL implantation.
  • Preoperative biometry obtained using Zeiss IOLMaster and Alcon OcuScan RxP (acoustic biometry).
  • Keratometry measured by Zeiss IOLMaster and Topcon KR-8800 (automated keratometry).
  • Postoperative refraction measured one month after surgery for accuracy assessment.

Main Results:

  • The combination of IOLMaster biometry and keratometry demonstrated the highest predictability (Mean Absolute Error [MAE] of 0.38 ± 0.28D).
  • IOLMaster biometry + IOLMaster keratometry outperformed other device combinations (P < 0.05).
  • Even for eyes unresponsive to IOLMaster biometry, IOLMaster keratometry showed better accuracy (MAE 0.62 ± 0.56D) compared to KR-8800 (MAE 0.57 ± 0.52D).

Conclusions:

  • The Zeiss IOLMaster offers superior accuracy for refractive outcomes compared to conventional methods after personalized optimization.
  • IOLMaster keratometry provides more reliable measurements than automated keratometry, even when axial length measurement by IOLMaster is not feasible.
  • These findings support the use of the Zeiss IOLMaster for enhanced precision in IOL power calculations.