Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
P-value01:10

P-value

P-value is one of the most crucial concepts in statistics.
P-value stands for the probability value.  P-value is the probability that, if the null hypothesis is true, the results from another randomly selected sample will be as extreme or more extreme as the results obtained from the given sample.
A large P-value calculated from the data indicates to  not reject the null hypothesis. But a higher P-value does not mean that the null hypothesis is true. The smaller the P-value, the more unlikely...
Determination of Expected Frequency01:08

Determination of Expected Frequency

Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
Multiple Regression01:25

Multiple Regression

Multiple regression assesses a linear relationship between one response or dependent variable and two or more independent variables. It has many practical applications.
Farmers can use multiple regression to determine the crop yield based on more than one factor, such as water availability, fertilizer, soil properties, etc. Here, the crop yield is the response or dependent variable as it depends on the other independent variables. The analysis requires the construction of a scatter plot...
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n) to the number of categories (k).

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC treated with 45 or 30 mg starting doses of dacomitinib: a retrospective multicenter analysis.

Therapeutic advances in medical oncology·2026
Same author

Processing efficiency predicts cognitive performance in aging.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Oxytocin mediates self-other and inevitability asymmetries in high-conflict moral judgment in schizophrenia.

Asian journal of psychiatry·2026
Same author

Correction: Real-World Outcomes of Sequential Afatinib and Osimertinib Versus Afatinib and Chemotherapy in EGFR-Mutant NSCLC: Taiwan Multicenter GIANT Study.

Targeted oncology·2026
Same author

Longitudinal associations among childhood trauma, oxytocin, and metabolic risk in schizophrenia.

Psychiatry research·2026
Same author

Revealing unseen wounds: a cluster analysis of psychological and pandemic-driven factors associated with self-injury among global students.

BMC psychology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 16, 2026

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

Relative change probability affects the decision process of detecting multiple feature changes.

Cheng-Ta Yang1, Ting-Yun Chang, Chia-Jung Wu

  • 1Department of Psychology.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|November 15, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study reveals how the likelihood of feature changes influences decision-making in change detection tasks. Implicit learning of change probability affects processing strategies, demonstrating cognitive flexibility.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 16, 2026

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Perception
  • Human Information Processing

Background:

  • Real-world changes involve multiple feature alterations, with varying frequencies.
  • Understanding how relative change probability impacts cognitive processes is crucial for explaining decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of relative change probability on comparison and decision processes in a change detection task.
  • To examine how manipulating the frequency of orientation and spatial frequency changes influences processing strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a change detection task with manipulated probabilities of feature changes (orientation and spatial frequency).
  • Three experiments varied the relative change probability and cognitive resource availability.
  • Implicit learning of change probability was assessed through participant reports and observed strategies.

Main Results:

  • Parallel self-terminating processing occurred when feature changes were equally probable.
  • Serial self-terminating processing was adopted when one feature (spatial frequency) changed more often than another (orientation).
  • Parallel processing persisted even with relative saliency when cognitive resources were limited, indicating implicit learning of change probability.

Conclusions:

  • Relative change probability influences feature salience and dictates decision strategies.
  • Perceptual comparison and decision processes are adaptable, modulated by feature saliency and available cognitive resources.
  • Evidence suggests implicit learning of change probability, impacting cognitive strategy selection without conscious awareness.