Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
Published on: March 13, 2014
Bias and error in understanding plant invasion impacts
Philip E Hulme1, Petr Pyšek, Vojtěch Jarošík
1The Bio-Protection Research Centre, PO Box 84, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand. philip.hulme@lincoln.ac.nz
Abstract:
Quantitative assessments of alien plant impacts are essential to inform management to ensure that resources are prioritized against the most problematic species and that restoration targets the worst-affected ecosystem processes. Here, we present the first detailed critique of quantitative field studies of alien plant impacts and highlight biases in the biogeography and life form of the target species, the responses assessed, and the extent to which spatial variability is addressed. Observed impacts often fail to translate to ecosystem services or evidence of environmental degradation. The absence of overarching hypotheses regarding impacts has reduced the consistency of approaches worldwide and prevented the development of predictive tools. Future studies must ensure that the links between species traits, ecosystem stocks, and ecosystem flows, as well as ecosystem services, are explicitly defined.
Related Concept Videos
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null hypothesis and 'fail to...
Microbe-Plant Interactions
Defenses Against Pathogens and Herbivores
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
The Roles of Bacteria and Fungi in Plant Nutrition
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
