Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

07:15
Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
Published on: December 18, 2020
Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state
Natasha Merat1, A Hamish Jamson, Frank C H Lai
1Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. n.merat@its.leeds.ac.uk
Human Factors
|November 20, 2012
Summary
Highly automated driving performance is comparable to manual driving unless drivers are distracted by secondary tasks. Driver workload impacts blink patterns, with higher workload suppressing blinking in both driving modes.
Area of Science:
- Human-computer interaction
- Automotive engineering
- Cognitive psychology
Background:
- The increasing integration of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) is shifting the driver's role from operator to supervisor.
- Understanding the impact of vehicle automation on driver behavior and road safety is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of workload changes on performance in manual versus highly automated driving.
- To investigate driver state variations through blink pattern analysis during different driving conditions.
Main Methods:
- Fifty participants operated a driving simulator in both manual and highly automated modes.
- Workload was manipulated through driving-specific tasks and a secondary "Twenty Questions Task."
- Driver performance and blink patterns were recorded and analyzed.
Main Results:
- Driver response to critical incidents was similar in manual and automated driving without secondary tasks.
- Performance degraded significantly when drivers had to regain control in automated mode while distracted.
- Blink frequency was more consistent in manual driving and suppressed under high workload.
Conclusions:
- Highly automated driving does not inherently impair driver performance when attention is maintained.
- Driver engagement and situation awareness remain critical factors in automated driving systems.
- Further research is needed to understand the long-term implications of automation on driver engagement.
Related Concept Videos
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness
Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...
Controller Configurations
Controller configurations are crucial in a car's cruise control system because they manage speed over time to maintain a consistent pace regardless of road conditions, thereby meeting design goals. In traditional control systems, fixed-configuration design involves predetermined controller placement. System performance modifications are known as compensation.
Control-system compensation involves various configurations, most commonly series or cascade compensation, in which the controller aligns...
Control-system compensation involves various configurations, most commonly series or cascade compensation, in which the controller aligns...
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior
Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...

