Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness01:19

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...
Controller Configurations01:22

Controller Configurations

Controller configurations are crucial in a car's cruise control system because they manage speed over time to maintain a consistent pace regardless of road conditions, thereby meeting design goals. In traditional control systems, fixed-configuration design involves predetermined controller placement. System performance modifications are known as compensation.
Control-system compensation involves various configurations, most commonly series or cascade compensation, in which the controller aligns...
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Investigation of driving safety in partial driving automation considering driving modes and drivers' pre-drive states.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same author

Does acceptance of driver monitoring systems differ across countries? A latent profile analysis approach.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same author

Using psychophysiological metrics for understanding drivers' mental workload and visual attention when overtaking automated truck platoons.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same author

Crossing in the dark: Investigating the effect of vehicle kinematics and eHMI on older pedestrians' crossing behavior in a virtual reality experiment.

Journal of safety research·2026
Same author

The impact of N-back-induced mental workload and time budget on takeover performance.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2025
Same author

Assessing data imbalance correction methods and gaze entropy for collision prediction.

PloS one·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 16, 2026

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state.

Natasha Merat1, A Hamish Jamson, Frank C H Lai

  • 1Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. n.merat@its.leeds.ac.uk

Human Factors
|November 20, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Highly automated driving performance is comparable to manual driving unless drivers are distracted by secondary tasks. Driver workload impacts blink patterns, with higher workload suppressing blinking in both driving modes.

More Related Videos

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing
07:48

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Published on: April 4, 2025

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 16, 2026

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing
07:48

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Published on: April 4, 2025

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Human-computer interaction
  • Automotive engineering
  • Cognitive psychology

Background:

  • The increasing integration of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) is shifting the driver's role from operator to supervisor.
  • Understanding the impact of vehicle automation on driver behavior and road safety is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effects of workload changes on performance in manual versus highly automated driving.
  • To investigate driver state variations through blink pattern analysis during different driving conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Fifty participants operated a driving simulator in both manual and highly automated modes.
  • Workload was manipulated through driving-specific tasks and a secondary "Twenty Questions Task."
  • Driver performance and blink patterns were recorded and analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Driver response to critical incidents was similar in manual and automated driving without secondary tasks.
  • Performance degraded significantly when drivers had to regain control in automated mode while distracted.
  • Blink frequency was more consistent in manual driving and suppressed under high workload.

Conclusions:

  • Highly automated driving does not inherently impair driver performance when attention is maintained.
  • Driver engagement and situation awareness remain critical factors in automated driving systems.
  • Further research is needed to understand the long-term implications of automation on driver engagement.