Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

Removal of Trace Elements by Cupric Oxide Nanoparticles from Uranium In Situ Recovery Bleed Water and Its Effect on Cell Viability
Published on: June 21, 2015
Influence of chelating agents on biogenic uraninite reoxidation by Fe(III) (Hydr)oxides
Brandy D Stewart1, Crystal Girardot, Nicolas Spycher
1Chemical and Biological Engineering and Center for Biofilm Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717, United States.
Abstract:
Microbially mediated reduction of soluble U(VI) to U(IV) with subsequent precipitation of uraninite, UO(2(S)), has been proposed as a method for limiting uranium (U) migration. However, microbially reduced UO(2) may be susceptible to reoxidation by environmental factors, with Fe(III) (hydr)oxides playing a significant role. Little is known about the role that organic compounds such as Fe(III) chelators play in the stability of reduced U. Here, we investigate the impact of citrate, DFB, EDTA, and NTA on biogenic UO(2) reoxidation with ferrihydrite, goethite, and hematite. Experiments were conducted in anaerobic batch systems in PIPES buffer (10 mM, pH 7) with bicarbonate for approximately 80 days. Results showed EDTA accelerated UO(2) reoxidation the most at an initial rate of 9.5 μM day(-1) with ferrihydrite, 8.6 μM day(-1) with goethite, and 8.8 μM day(-1) with hematite. NTA accelerated UO(2) reoxidation with ferrihydrite at a rate of 4.8 μM day(-1); rates were less with goethite and hematite (0.66 and 0.71 μM day(-1), respectively). Citrate increased UO(2) reoxidation with ferrihydrite at a rate of 1.8 μM day(-1), but did not increase the extent of reaction with goethite or hematite, with no reoxidation in this case. In all cases, bicarbonate increased the rate and extent of UO(2) reoxidation with ferrihydrite in the presence and absence of chelators. The highest rate of UO(2) reoxidation occurred when the chelator promoted both UO(2) and Fe(III) (hydr)oxide dissolution as demonstrated with EDTA. When UO(2) dissolution did not occur, UO(2) reoxidation likely proceeded through an aqueous Fe(III) intermediate with lower reoxidation rates observed. Reaction modeling suggests that strong Fe(II) chelators promote reoxidation whereas strong Fe(III) chelators impede it. These results indicate that chelators found in U contaminated sites may play a significant role in mobilizing U, potentially affecting bioremediation efforts.
More Related Videos
12:05U2O5 Film Preparation via UO2 Deposition by Direct Current Sputtering and Successive Oxidation and Reduction with Atomic Oxygen and Atomic Hydrogen
Published on: February 21, 2019
06:52Experimental Column Setup for Studying Anaerobic Biogeochemical Interactions Between Iron (Oxy)Hydroxides, Trace Elements, and Bacteria
Published on: December 19, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Microbial Bioremediation of Uranium
Microbial Leaching
Extraction: Advanced Methods
Redox Titration: Other Oxidizing and Reducing Agents
Complexation Equilibria: The Chelate Effect
EDTA: Auxiliary Complexing Reagents