Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 16, 2026

Quantification of Cell-Substrate Adhesion Area and Cell Shape Distributions in MCF7 Cell Monolayers
06:46

Quantification of Cell-Substrate Adhesion Area and Cell Shape Distributions in MCF7 Cell Monolayers

Published on: June 24, 2020

Roughness statistical influence on cell adhesion using profilometry and multiscale analysis.

Sylvain Giljean1, Maxence Bigerelle, Karine Anselme

  • 1Laboratoire Physique et Mécanique Textile (LPMT), EA 4365, Université de Haute-Alsace, Mulhouse, France.

Scanning
|November 21, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The O‑GlcNAcase Inhibition by Thiamet G Disrupts the AngioMatrix Signature of the Glioblastoma Secretome In Silico and Impairs Its Angiogenic Capacity In Vitro.

Journal of molecular biology·2026
Same author

Surface Inspection and Description in Metrology and Tribology-Vol. 2.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Multiscale and re-entrant surface analysis of multi jet fusion surfaces and the effect of postprocessing via sandblasting.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Breast implant silicone exposure induces immunogenic response and autoimmune markers in human periprosthetic tissue.

Biomaterials·2024
Same author

Fabrication and characterization of thin self-rolling film for anti-inflammatory drug delivery.

Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces·2024
Same author

Two 3D Fractal-Based Approaches for Topographical Characterization: Richardson Patchwork versus Sdr.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same journal

Retracted: Diagnostic Efficacy of CT Radiomic Features in Pulmonary Invasive Mucinous Adenocarcinoma.

Scanning·2023
Same journal

Retracted: 3D Convolutional Neural Network Framework with Deep Learning for Nuclear Medicine.

Scanning·2023
Same journal

Retracted: Observation on the Effect of MRI Image Scanning on Knee Pain in Football Injury.

Scanning·2023
Same journal

Retracted: Optimal Cellular Microscopic Pattern Recognizer- (OCMPR-) Based Wireless Detection Network for Efficiently Leveraging the Parallel Distributed Processing Capabilities.

Scanning·2023
Same journal

Retracted: Changes of Volume Parameters in the Treatment of Graves Ophthalmopathy by Endoscopic Transethmoidal Decompression of the Orbital Inner Wall Combined with Fat Decompression.

Scanning·2023
Same journal

Retracted: Diagnostic Value of Specialist Systems in Sports Knee Injuries.

Scanning·2023
See all related articles

Biomaterial surface roughness between Ra = 0.01 and 0.1 μm has no effect on human osteoblast adhesion. Cell behavior is only influenced by groove width on titanium alloy (TiAl6V4) and stainless steel (316L) surfaces.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Cell Biology
  • Surface Engineering

Background:

  • Surface properties of biomaterials significantly influence cellular responses.
  • Understanding the impact of surface topography on cell behavior is crucial for developing effective implants.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the influence of biomaterial roughness on human osteoblast behavior.
  • To determine the critical surface parameters affecting cell adhesion and orientation.

Main Methods:

  • Polishing of TiAl6V4 titanium alloy and 316L stainless steel samples to achieve varying isotropic roughness levels.
  • Topographical analysis using a tactile profilometer with multiscale analysis.
  • Culturing of human osteoblasts on the prepared biomaterial surfaces.
Keywords:
computer simulationlife sciencesmetrologypolishing techniquesurface analysis

More Related Videos

Control of Cell Adhesion using Hydrogel Patterning Techniques for Applications in Traction Force Microscopy
12:26

Control of Cell Adhesion using Hydrogel Patterning Techniques for Applications in Traction Force Microscopy

Published on: January 29, 2022

Thin Film Composite Silicon Elastomers for Cell Culture and Skin Applications: Manufacturing and Characterization
08:02

Thin Film Composite Silicon Elastomers for Cell Culture and Skin Applications: Manufacturing and Characterization

Published on: July 3, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 16, 2026

Quantification of Cell-Substrate Adhesion Area and Cell Shape Distributions in MCF7 Cell Monolayers
06:46

Quantification of Cell-Substrate Adhesion Area and Cell Shape Distributions in MCF7 Cell Monolayers

Published on: June 24, 2020

Control of Cell Adhesion using Hydrogel Patterning Techniques for Applications in Traction Force Microscopy
12:26

Control of Cell Adhesion using Hydrogel Patterning Techniques for Applications in Traction Force Microscopy

Published on: January 29, 2022

Thin Film Composite Silicon Elastomers for Cell Culture and Skin Applications: Manufacturing and Characterization
08:02

Thin Film Composite Silicon Elastomers for Cell Culture and Skin Applications: Manufacturing and Characterization

Published on: July 3, 2018

Main Results:

  • No reproducible effect of roughness on overall cell behavior was observed within the tested range (Ra = 0.01–0.1 μm).
  • Cell orientation was influenced by wider grooves on the biomaterial surfaces.
  • Cell adhesion mechanisms were unaffected by isotropic roughness below a critical groove width.

Conclusions:

  • Isotropic surface roughness in the range of Ra = 0.01–0.1 μm does not significantly impact osteoblast adhesion.
  • Groove width is a critical factor influencing cell behavior, specifically orientation, on titanium alloy and stainless steel surfaces.
  • Biomaterial surface topography requires careful consideration of groove dimensions, not just roughness, for optimal cell interaction.