Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

Noninvasive, High-throughput Determination of Sleep Duration in Rodents
Published on: April 18, 2018
How should we best estimate the mean recency duration for the BED method?
John Hargrove1, Hayden Eastwood, Guy Mahiane
1The South African Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation Centre of Excellence in Epidemiological Modelling and Analysis, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa. jhargrove@sun.ac.za
Estimating HIV incidence using BED assay requires accurate mean recency duration (Ω(T)). Non-linear mixed modeling (NLMM) provided the best fit and most reliable estimates for this crucial parameter.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Biostatistics
- Public Health
Background:
- Biomarker-Enzyme-Detergent (BED) assay is used for estimating HIV incidence in cross-sectional surveys.
- Accurate estimation of mean recency duration (Ω(T)) is critical for reliable HIV incidence calculations.
- Various statistical methods exist for estimating Ω(T), each with potential limitations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare five different methods for estimating the mean recency duration (Ω(T)) using BED assay data.
- To determine the most accurate and reliable method for Ω(T) estimation in the context of HIV incidence surveillance.
- To assess the impact of the chosen cut-off (C) on false-recent rates and incidence estimation.
Main Methods:
- The study compared five methods: ratio (r/s), linear mixed modeling (LMM), non-linear mixed modeling (NLMM), survival analysis (SA), and graphical analysis.
- Data from postpartum women in Zimbabwe were used to estimate Ω(T) for a cut-off C = 0.8.
- Model fits, variance of estimates, and correspondence with follow-up incidence data were used for comparison.
Main Results:
- All five methods provided similar estimates of Ω(T), ranging from 191 to 196 days.
- Non-linear mixed modeling (NLMM) demonstrated the best fit to optical density data and the smallest variance in Ω(T) estimates.
- NLMM showed the best correspondence between BED and follow-up HIV incidence estimates.
- Survival analysis (SA) and NLMM yielded similar Ω(T) estimates, but SA had a higher coefficient of variation.
- False-recent rates increased quadratically with the cut-off (C).
Conclusions:
- Non-linear mixed modeling (NLMM) is recommended as the preferred method for estimating mean recency duration (Ω(T)) with BED assay data due to its superior fit and reliability.
- Accurate estimation of Ω(T) is achievable and should not impede HIV incidence estimation.
- Choosing a small cut-off (C) is advisable to minimize false-recent rates while ensuring sufficient recent cases for accurate estimation.
Related Concept Videos
Midrange
Simply put, the midrange is half of the data set’s range. Similar to the mean, the midrange is sensitive to the extreme values and hence the prospective outliers. However, unlike the mean, the midrange is not sensitive to all the values of the data set that lie in the middle. Thus, it is prone to outliers and...
Noncompartmental Analysis: Mean Residence Time
After the administration of a drug through intravenous bolus injection, the drug molecules are distributed throughout the body and remain there for varying periods. The MRT represents the average time these drug molecules stay in the...
Regression Toward the Mean
Noncompartmental Analysis: Mean Transit, Absorption and Dissolution Time
One of the key parameters is the mean transit time (MTT), which refers to the total duration required for drug molecules to transit through the body. MTT is determined by calculating the ratio of the area under the moment curve to the area...
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate + error bound)
The...
Kaplan-Meier Approach

