Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

Sampling, Identification and Characterization of Microplastics Release from Polypropylene Baby Feeding Bottle during Daily Use
Published on: July 24, 2021
Microwave disinfection: assessing the risks of irrigation bottle and fluid contamination
1Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Background:
It was previously shown that 50% of irrigation bottles and 40% of irrigation fluids had evidence of bacterial contamination despite cleaning with hot water and soap. Although a novel method of microwave disinfection has recently been proposed to minimize contamination risk, this has not been studied in a real life setting. This study investigates the effectiveness of microwave disinfection for reducing both nasal irrigation bottle and irrigation fluid contamination risk after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS).
Methods:
Twenty consecutive patients underwent ESS for chronic rhinosinusitis. Patients were given NeilMed Sinus Rinse bottles (NeilMed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Santa Rosa CA) to use twice daily, with microwave cleaning instructions preoperatively. Bottles were collected and cultured 1 week postoperatively. Sterile saline (5 mL) was mixed into the irrigation bottle and cultured separately. An additional 10 patients were recruited whereby the bottle was cultured at collection and immediately after microwave disinfection was performed in the clinic.
Results:
For the first cohort of the study, 40% of the bottles and 20% of the irrigation samples had positive cultures 1 week postoperatively. Common bacteria included Acinetobacter, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, and Gram-negative bacilli. For the second cohort of patients, 20% of the irrigation bottles had positive cultures. However, after supervised microwave disinfection, there was a 0% contamination rate.
Conclusion:
Despite detailed instructions on microwave disinfection, positive bacterial cultures may still occur after ESS. This risk, however, appears to be significantly reduced when bottles are microwaved under supervision. These findings suggest either a reduced patient compliance to cleaning or a time-dependent recontamination risk after disinfection.
Insights
Microwave disinfection of nasal irrigation bottles after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) significantly reduces bacterial contamination risk. Supervised cleaning yielded a 0% contamination rate, suggesting improved patient compliance or reduced recontamination.
Area of Science:
- Otolaryngology
- Infectious Disease Control
- Medical Device Sterilization
Background:
- Nasal irrigation bottles frequently show bacterial contamination (50% bottles, 40% fluids) even with soap and hot water.
- Microwave disinfection is a novel method to reduce contamination risk, but its real-world effectiveness post-endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is unstudied.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the efficacy of microwave disinfection in reducing bacterial contamination of nasal irrigation bottles and fluids.
- To assess contamination rates after ESS when using microwave disinfection.
Main Methods:
- Twenty patients undergoing ESS for chronic rhinosinusitis used microwave-cleaned nasal irrigation bottles twice daily.
- Bottles and irrigation fluid were cultured one week postoperatively. A second cohort had bottles cultured before and after supervised microwave disinfection.
Main Results:
- In the first cohort, 40% of bottles and 20% of irrigation samples were contaminated after one week.
- Common contaminants included Acinetobacter, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, and Gram-negative bacilli.
- Supervised microwave disinfection in the second cohort resulted in a 0% contamination rate.
Conclusions:
- Despite instructions, unsupervised microwave disinfection may not eliminate contamination after ESS.
- Supervised microwave disinfection significantly reduces bacterial contamination risk in nasal irrigation bottles.
- Findings suggest potential issues with patient compliance or time-dependent recontamination.
Related Concept Videos
Physical Methods for Controlling Microbial Growth: Radiation and Filtration
Cleaning, Sterilization, and Disinfection
Cleaning
The cleaning process usually involves using water with detergents or enzymatic cleaner and removing foreign material from objects and surfaces, including organic material such as body fluids or inorganic material like soil. Cleaning is performed before high-level disinfection and sterilization because foreign materials on the cover of the devices interfere with process...
Methods of Sterilization I: Physical Methods
Steam sterilization uses non-toxic, low-cost moist heat in the form of saturated steam under pressure, which is fast, microbicidal, and sporicidal, and quickly warms and penetrates fabrics. Autoclaves, or steam sterilizers, expose each item to direct steam contact for a predetermined time at the necessary...
Methods for Controlling Microbial Growth
Hand hygiene
Hand washing...
Methods of Sterilization II: Chemical Methods
Using chemical sterilization rather than heat to clean out equipment is recommended. It eradicates and removes all bacteria,...
