Related Experiment Videos
Rigidity in mentally retarded and nonretarded children
S Kreitler1, E Zigler, H Kreitler
1Department of Psychology, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
American Journal of Mental Retardation : AJMR
|March 1, 1990
Summary
Mentally retarded individuals exhibit greater rigidity on difficult tasks compared to nonretarded individuals. This rigidity difference was not observed on easier tasks, suggesting a motivational component.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
- Cognitive Psychology
Background:
- Rigidity is a cognitive style that can be influenced by task difficulty.
- Previous research has explored rigidity in various populations, but its relationship with task difficulty in individuals with mental retardation requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the dependence of rigidity on task difficulty in mentally retarded and nonretarded individuals.
- To test the hypothesis that mentally retarded subjects would be more rigid than nonretarded subjects on difficult tasks, but not on easy tasks.
Main Methods:
- Administered an intelligence test and seven rigidity tests of varying difficulty to 45 mentally retarded and 45 MA-matched nonretarded subjects.
- Utilized factor analysis to explore the structure of rigidity within each group.
- Analyzed differences in rigidity scores between groups across easy and difficult tasks.
Main Results:
- Factor analyses revealed one rigidity factor for the retarded group and two for the nonretarded group.
- Rigidity tests demonstrated a Guttman simplex structure in terms of difficulty for both groups.
- No significant differences in rigidity were found on easy tests, but significant differences emerged on more difficult tests.
Conclusions:
- The findings support the hypothesis that mentally retarded individuals exhibit increased rigidity on difficult tasks.
- Results are interpreted within a motivational framework, suggesting that motivational factors play a role in rigidity.
- Rigidity is proposed as an interactional concept with implications for understanding mental retardation.