Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

In Vivo Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Structure, Function, Perfusion and Viability Using Cardiac Micro-computed Tomography
Published on: February 16, 2016
Assessing the available techniques for testing myocardial viability: what does the future hold?
Brian P Shapiro1, Patricia J Mergo, Christopher O Austin
1Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA. shapiro.brian@mayo.edu
Assessing myocardial viability is crucial for patients with severe coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. Viability testing may guide treatment decisions, though its impact on long-term survival remains under investigation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Cardiovascular Disease
Background:
- Severe coronary artery disease (CAD) with left ventricular dysfunction presents a complex clinical challenge.
- Patients with CAD and reduced ejection fraction have poor prognoses, but outcomes vary after revascularization.
- Irreversibly scarred myocardium may not benefit from revascularization, unlike viable but hibernating myocardium.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the role and current evidence regarding myocardial viability testing in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.
- To discuss the potential benefits and limitations of viability assessment in guiding therapeutic strategies.
- To highlight emerging technologies in the field of viability testing.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on myocardial viability testing in ischemic cardiomyopathy.
- Discussion of various noninvasive imaging modalities for assessing myocardial viability.
- Consideration of the predictive value of viability testing for functional recovery and prognosis.
Main Results:
- Myocardial viability testing can predict regional and global functional recovery of the left ventricle.
- The ability of current viability studies to predict long-term survival and overall prognosis is not yet definitively proven in prospective studies.
- Some patients with hibernating myocardium may benefit from revascularization, while those with transmural infarction are less likely to recover function.
Conclusions:
- Myocardial viability testing is a valuable tool for selecting patients who may benefit from revascularization, despite inconclusive data on survival benefits.
- Noninvasive viability assessment aids in tailoring treatment strategies for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.
- Advancements in imaging technologies like PET and cardiac MRI are expected to further refine viability assessment in the future.
Related Concept Videos
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
