Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions
Published on: January 7, 2019
Prediction of 24-hour-average PM(2.5) concentrations using a hidden Markov model with different emission
Wei Sun1, Hao Zhang, Ahmet Palazoglu
1Beijing Key Laboratory of Membrane Separation Process and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China.
Abstract:
Prediction of air pollutant levels plays an important role in the regulatory plans aimed at the control and reduction of airborne pollutants such as fine particulate matter (PM). Deterministic photochemical air quality models, which are commonly used for regulatory management and planning, are computationally intensive and also expensive for routine predictions. Compared to deterministic photochemical air quality models, data-driven statistical models are simpler and may be more accurate. In this paper, hidden Markov models (HMM) are used to forecast daily average PM(2.5) concentrations 24 h ahead. In conventional HMM applications, observation distributions emitted from certain hidden states are assumed as having Gaussian distributions. However, certain key meteorological factors and most PM(2.5) precursors exhibit a non-Gaussian distribution in reality, which would degrade the HMM performance significantly. In order to address this problem, in this paper, HMMs with log-normal, Gamma and generalized extreme value (GEV) distributions are developed to predict PM(2.5) concentration at Concord and Sacramento monitors in Northern California. Results show that HMM with non-Gaussian emission distributions is able to predict PM(2.5) exceedance days correctly and reduces false alarms dramatically. Compared to HMM with Gaussian distributions, HMM with log-normal distributions can improve the true prediction rate (TPR) by 37.5% and reduce the false alarms by 78% at Concord. And HMM with GEV distribution can improve TPR by 150% and reduce false alarms by 63.62% at Sacramento Del Paso Manor. Comparisons between different distributions used in HMM show that the closer the distribution employed in HMM is to the observation sequence, the better the model prediction performance.
More Related Videos
10:29Calibrated Passive Sampling - Multi-plot Field Measurements of NH3 Emissions with a Combination of Dynamic Tube Method and Passive Samplers
Published on: March 21, 2016
11:19Measuring Carbon-based Contaminant Mineralization Using Combined CO2 Flux and Radiocarbon Analyses
Published on: October 21, 2016