Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Indications and contraindications for double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Bart Muller¹, Marcus Hofbauer, Jidapa Wongcharoenwatana

¹Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Kaufman Building Suite 1011, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. bart.muller@live.nl

International Orthopaedics

|November 27, 2012

Summary

Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction offers biomechanical advantages over single-bundle techniques. However, both anatomical approaches can yield similar results when tailored to individual patient anatomy.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The Popeye sign: beyond the bulge-a proposal for a standardized definition and classification.

Clinics in shoulder and elbow·2026

Same author

Lateral extra-articular procedures combined with ACL reconstructions lead to a higher return to pre-injury level of sport: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Journal of experimental orthopaedics·2025

Same author

Return to preinjury sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is predicted by five independent factors.

Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA·2021

Same author

Minimally Invasive Modified Lemaire Tenodesis.

Arthroscopy techniques·2021

Same author

Partial meniscectomy does not affect the biomechanics of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knee with a lateral posterior meniscal root tear.

Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA·2020

Same author

Meniscal ramp lesions should be considered in anterior cruciate ligament-injured knees, especially with larger instability or longer delay before surgery.

Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA·2020

Area of Science:

Orthopedic surgery
Sports medicine
Biomechanics

Background:

Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has gained popularity due to improved biomechanical outcomes and reduced rotational instability compared to single-bundle techniques.
Anatomical single-bundle and double-bundle ACL reconstructions have shown similar results, shifting focus towards restoring native anatomy.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the current consensus on double-bundle versus single-bundle ACL reconstruction.
To explore the individualization of surgical approaches based on patient-specific anatomy.

Main Methods:

Review of recent studies comparing single-bundle and double-bundle ACL reconstruction techniques.
Analysis of biomechanical advantages and clinical outcomes.

Related Experiment Videos

Consideration of anatomical factors influencing surgical technique selection.

Main Results:

No definitive consensus exists on whether double-bundle is superior to single-bundle ACL reconstruction.
Both anatomical single-bundle and double-bundle techniques have specific indications and contraindications.
Individualized surgical approaches based on native ACL characteristics are crucial.

Conclusions:

ACL reconstruction should prioritize restoring native functional and anatomical properties.
The choice between single-bundle and double-bundle techniques should be guided by patient-specific anatomical characteristics.
Both methods can be performed successfully within the framework of an anatomical double-bundle concept.